Electroline FM Amplifier Question

Status
Not open for further replies.

JimD56

KO9JAD/Fire Lieutenant/Paramedic
Feed Provider
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
784
Location
Davie, FL (Miami/Fort Lauderdale Metro)
Just picked up my second Electroline FM Amplifier. Good from 1.5mhz to 2.0 Ghz. It's a 2 way. A lot cheaper than the Stridsberg.
It is rated at +11db Amplification on each output.
My question, What is the signal loss "receiving only" scanner use, using 30 feet of RG6 from a UHF Antenna with Ground Plane in the attic to the amplifier at my scanner feed PC. The scanners are both BC125ATs. The line loss calculators online only do transmit loss.
 

900mhz

Member
Joined
May 13, 2005
Messages
432
Just picked up my second Electroline FM Amplifier. Good from 1.5mhz to 2.0 Ghz. It's a 2 way. A lot cheaper than the Stridsberg.
It is rated at +11db Amplification on each output.
My question, What is the signal loss "receiving only" scanner use, using 30 feet of RG6 from a UHF Antenna with Ground Plane in the attic to the amplifier at my scanner feed PC. The scanners are both BC125ATs. The line loss calculators online only do transmit loss.
cable loss is the same whether it be transmit or receive, assuming you reference the same frequency.
 

737mech

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
2,438
Location
Clark County, NV.
+11db wow that's pretty high for the front end of a BC125AT! I use the electroline 8 ports and they are only +4db enough to make up for the 1 to 8 split. 30 feet of RG-6 is almost no loss for a scanner. If you find you aren't hearing much try the FM trap or bandpass filters. I've tried that 1 to 2 electroline, in fact sitting here in my drawer, way too hot for my area. Fort Lauderdale probably just as busy with cell towers radio stations etc' etc'. Good luck let us know how it works.
 

phask

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
3,679
Location
KZZV - SE Ohio
FWIW - I've been using this one for a year now with no issues.

Feeding 4 scanners and compared to single feed it shows s improvement. Feeding 4 is better than an unamplified signal to 1 so I call it a win.

I went with that brand as I had a single output amp the Spectrum pulled from my Internet feed. It worked well and figure if the brand is good enough for them...
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
9,028
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
In 99% of the cases an amplifier will improve reception. Even those high noise tv amplifiers will most often also work. That 8dB amp has a 3dB noise figure. Imagine what will happen if you use a low noise 0,5dB amplifier that will improve reception by more than 2dB compared to the 8dB amp without doing anything else than having it connected to your scanner. But if you then move it up to the antenna you will also add those dB's that are lost in the antenna coax to the total gain in sensitivity. Just be sure to not overload the scanners frontend and attenuate enough between amp and scanner to not loose sensitivity be desensing the frontend from a too high signal level.

/Ubbe
 

JimD56

KO9JAD/Fire Lieutenant/Paramedic
Feed Provider
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
784
Location
Davie, FL (Miami/Fort Lauderdale Metro)
My 2 Output Electroline FM Amplifier is working great. Using it on my Broadcastify feed, I'm in Fort Lauderdale and it is pulling in the furthest UHF repeater in south Miami pretty clear. Go to my feed and listen for your self. (y) Miami-Dade Fire Rescue, the ((Stereo Feed)) on Broadcastify.
Thanks
 

BIODTL1997

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
361
Location
Northeast, NJ
I'm running an Electroline EDA 2800 8 port (4dB gain per port) amp from a DPD OmniX antenna at about 60' elevation (12' mast on a 4 story building with an attic + ~50' LMR400) in North NJ and it's pulling in strong! I have it split to 4 Moto radios, a DS200 and 3 SDR sticks) and I'm receiving public safety systems 70 miles south (Jersey shore) and Coast Guard Sector South New England. I just repositioned the antenna last week so I'm still testing it's limits.


 

kruser

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
4,989
Location
West St Louis County, MO
The problem I've seen with these type amps is they don't really work for low band VHF.
These cable tv amps all have a lower cutoff at 42 MHz for reception. They will pass 42 MHz and below back out to the cable company but will generally block it incoming. This is because today's cable tv systems are two way sytems with the frequencies below 42 MHz used for the return signal back to the cable plant.

If you don't monitor low band below 42 MHz, then they can help depending on the overall RF levels in your area not being super strong to just introduce overload and odd mixing products from the amp.
 

vagrant

ker-muhj-uhn
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
3,170
Location
California
I use an Electroline 4 port amp with 0 dB gain on one of my antennas. I monitor local military rotor aircraft on 40 MHz and it works about as well as one would guess with a ST2 (scantenna). While that does work, I often use my HF radio and an OCF antenna for improved reception when there is more activity.

I may have some 8 port with gain in a box. I will try them and see. One must experiment.
 

JimD56

KO9JAD/Fire Lieutenant/Paramedic
Feed Provider
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
784
Location
Davie, FL (Miami/Fort Lauderdale Metro)
I run the 8 Port 2800 (+4db each) for my Scanner Rack from a Tram Discone and a Yagi 800-900mhz into a Comet duplexer, with one RG-6 cable about 20 ft run into the 8 Port 2800 Electroline and then the 2 Port (+11db each) for the Broadcasify Feed UHF 450-460mhz from a 2nd dedicated Discone Antenna just for that feed. All 3 antennas are in the attic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top