FCC Implements New 911 Law

Status
Not open for further replies.

KC9NCF

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Messages
225
Reaction score
1
How many pages is this FCC order? I really don't feel like reading through thousands of pages of legalese.
 

iMONITOR

Silent Key
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
11,156
Reaction score
3,909
Location
S.E. Michigan
How many pages is this FCC order? I really don't feel like reading through thousands of pages of legalese.

Opening it up in Acrobat Reader, it's showing it to be 59 pages. The link I provided sums it up in a paragraph.
 

rdale

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 3, 2001
Messages
11,380
Reaction score
6
Location
Lansing, MI
Nothing scanning related...

"The new rules allow VoIP carriers direct access to the nation's 911 systems, just like cellular carriers now have, and also sets out rates, terms and conditions for doing so."
 

k8mcn

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
240
Reaction score
1
Location
Old Monroe,MO
So, are you saying that 911

Nothing scanning related...

"The new rules allow VoIP carriers direct access to the nation's 911 systems, just like cellular carriers now have, and also sets out rates, terms and conditions for doing so."

So, are you saying that 911 calls are not in any way connected to scanning?? How so?
 

BuiltonAsus

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
I believe there is nothing in the new laws and statutes that would cause anyone with a scanner to be concerned. The only ones to feel this new legislature is VOIP customers who will then in turn be charged more for E911 service.
 

rdale

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 3, 2001
Messages
11,380
Reaction score
6
Location
Lansing, MI
So, are you saying that 911 calls are not in any way connected to scanning?? How so?

Until you can show me how 911 calls can be monitored on a scanner different from the way they used to be -- then yes.
 

scannerfreak

Well Known Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
5,193
Reaction score
20
Location
Indiana
Until you can show me how 911 calls can be monitored on a scanner different from the way they used to be -- then yes.


Why does it even matter that it might not be "scanner related"? Read the description of the forum, no where does it say it needs to be "scanner related". It just needs to be of interest to the community and I'd say this qualifies :)
 

rdale

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 3, 2001
Messages
11,380
Reaction score
6
Location
Lansing, MI
It just needs to be of interest to the community and I'd say this qualifies :)

Nobody said it didn't qualify - I was just letting people interested in scanning know that it wasn't of interest to them ;)
 

shaft

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2004
Messages
418
Reaction score
0
Location
Wentzville, Mo
I believe there is nothing in the new laws and statutes that would cause anyone with a scanner to be concerned. The only ones to feel this new legislature is VOIP customers who will then in turn be charged more for E911 service.

Actually it should remain the same or maybe a bit less. Right now we have to go thru the local LEC like SBC or Verizon etc... to connect to the local PSAP. The LECs charge an arm and a leg for this access, a direct connect will be a bit cheaper for all of us.
 

poltergeisty

Truth is a force of nature
Banned
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
4,012
Reaction score
132
Location
RLG, Fly heading 053, intercept 315 DVV
Until you can show me how 911 calls can be monitored on a scanner different from the way they used to be -- then yes.

Well, in the "scanner" sense, one could decode SIP traveling through the airwaves if the subscriber happens to be using WIFI. Providing that; A: The WIFI signal isn't using a strong WPA key and B: the VOIP communication isn't using SSL. :lol:


But yeah, Non-scanner related. :lol:


Isn't there already provisions that say VOIP carriers must use E911 services? I have Comcast voice and it goes through to Denver first, but I'm told it will then be delivered to my local dispatch. Haven't tried it yet.
 
Last edited:

ka5lqj

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2003
Messages
427
Reaction score
0
Location
Near Lakeview, LA (Caddo Parish)
Huh????

Ok,

I don't have the "time" nor "patience" to read through all that mumbo-jumbo, "legalese", LOL! So, just what are they saying? Think of ALL the trees, ink, money, we could save if they just "cut-to-the-chase". ;-)

POLITICS.......from the Latin.. Poly meaning "many" and ticks..... nasty, little, blood-suckers.

Respectfully,
73,

Don/KA5LQJ
 

shaft

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2004
Messages
418
Reaction score
0
Location
Wentzville, Mo
Well, in the "scanner" sense, one could decode SIP traveling through the airwaves if the subscriber happens to be using WIFI. Providing that; A: The WIFI signal isn't using a strong WPA key and B: the VOIP communication isn't using SSL. :lol:


But yeah, Non-scanner related. :lol:


Isn't there already provisions that say VOIP carriers must use E911 services? I have Comcast voice and it goes through to Denver first, but I'm told it will then be delivered to my local dispatch. Haven't tried it yet.

Yes we do and its mandated, but we had to use someone else to connect to it. With the new law, we can connect directly and eliminate the evil 3rd party.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top