While I share some of your angst about the state of our beloved hobby, I do have to ask how "no code techs" are all that different from "no code Generals" or even "no code Extra" for that matter?
No matter how carefully you address the topic or say you mean no offense, it seems that the words "No Code Tech" are the new "3rd Rail", sigh...
What I meant by "No Code Tech" was as in "entrance level license/foot in the door" into the hobby, (thus my gateway drug comment), like we use to call Novice but we can drop the "No Code" part, the word Technician class suffices for the intent of my statement. It was common knowledge that the reason the Novice license had a tiny bit of HF privileges was to allow new people to get a taste of what was there to enjoy and that the real fun begins once you've upgraded to General, Extra etc... But now, with providing the entry level class, all the fun without the effort (via network radios etc), there's no reason nor desire to upgrade for all but a very small percentage. After all, some have no problem stating they really didn't want to be hams or talk around the world on antennas they built and tested anyways, they just wanted the license for their off road dune buggy radios, what we all use to have CB for.
The point I was trying to get across, quite poorly it appears is that by giving such world wide privileges to the entry level exam, how can we be surprised when a HUGE number don't bother going past that level, there's nothing to gain in the opinions of some of them, and we NEED them to get move past a portable on 5 watts, because so much of the hobby could be lost without us all fighting for it (see my previous comment re antenna restrictions, loss of band, advocacy etc). You all, or some of you who are ARRL members, you can see each month what the ARRL does for us in Washington as you read QST.... wipe it all out if all we are is DMR, echolink etc. in 30 years.
Read some of what our "next generation" are writing when they talk about what they consider "ham radio" now (sample quotes and link below).... I'm sorry but I disagree 1000% on statements like below as I would imagine anyone who ever enjoyed going into a Heathkit store as a kid would, or waited all year for the new Radio Shack catalog.... I mean the author of these comments no disparagement but what he's talking about is not the ham radio, in fact it's not even radio.... and truth be told, is very hard for me to read.. who gave the next generation the right or authority to change or challenge anything as it seems so clearly the intent in one of the statements below....
I'm sorry, but no one but a select few have contributed enough to have earned the right to change ham radio for the rest of us, (mind you, if you upgrade to an extra, you'll have a lot more street cred and perhaps your views will carry weight).
But I'd prefer to keep ham radio what we all know and love than what some 24 year old who last week was on his CB, this week took a tech test easily memorized and is now going to change what has been part of our lives and saved hundreds of others, and we have worked so hard to protect.
---------------
Do Bands matter?
I have a suspicion that this is, in part at least, because bands and frequencies don’t matter so much these days. Domestic radio appliances are more about push buttons and screens that get you to your station instantly, rather than tuning dials with frequencies. It’s the end product that is important, not necessarily the manner in which it gets to you.
Traditional raison d’être of Ham Radio is waiting to be challenged to change and adapt, I don’t see this as a bad thing
The Internet is like one, almost infinitely wide, worldwide “band”, constantly open S9+40 to all countries 24/7 with few vagaries – and not just for voice, but for vision and other digital modes as well. Put like that, who wouldn’t want to use it? Would it actually matter what “band” you were (or were not) on, if there even were one?
As the hobby starts to come to terms with some of the implications of this, other issues then start to arise, such as…
- Do we need an exam any more to get a licence?
- Do we even need a licence?
https://network-radios.com/index.php/2018/03/07/its-not-real-ham-radio-by-chris-g7ddn/
---------------
Heck, an entry level ham license today permits you to talk places I was not permitted to, nor could have imagined being able to when I obtained my Novice ticket in 1986, that being because we've provided that entry level license full digital, DMR, network radio privileges etc... we may have shot ourselves in the foot....
Admit it or not, most of our motivations to upgrade were for more band privileges, higher power etc... well if you can talk around the world with a 5 watt portable, in this day and age where it's already hard enough to get the young crowd to get interested in outdoor activities like field day, we may have shot ourselves in the foot is all I'm saying.
Just my opinion, cus I care about the hobby and it's future, no disrespect intended toward code or no code... I answered the survey above based SOLELY on what I thought would help preserve what our hobby use to be..... technical ability, creating stuff, fixing stuff, building stuff and the excitement and frustration of counting the number of years till the next 11 year sun cycle..
All of that is replaced with a BaoFeng DMR portable.... and along with that joy, goes privileges. Most of them have died off, the replacements are on DMR now, they don't really need 75 meters, or the rest of 220 we took from them back 20 years ago for UPS who never bothered using it after all (how many of you remember that travesty?).... if we don't use it people, we're going to lose it.....
https://forums.radioreference.com/threads/ham-radio-dying-a-slow-miserable-death.319641/
Getting off my soap box, I could keep going all night... you get my point.... I care, and every silent key, is another nail in the coffin of our hobby.
Jen