FCC Reaches $900,000 Settlement for Unauthorized Satellite Launch

Status
Not open for further replies.

ipfd320

Member
Banned
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
751
Location
W.Babylon N.Y. 11704
Federal Communications Commission FCC 18-184
Before the Federal Communications Commission
Washington, DC 20554
In the Matter of Swarm Technologies, Inc.
File No.: EB-SED-18-00026685
Acct. No.: 201932100015
FRN: 0026233890

ORDER Adopted: December 14, 2018
Released: December 20, 2018
By the Commission: Chairman Pai and Commissioner O’Rielly issuing separate statements.

1. The Federal Communications Commission (the Commission) has entered into a Consent Decree to resolve its investigation into whether Swarm Technologies, Inc. (Swarm Technologies) engaged in unauthorized deployment and operation of satellites, unauthorized operation of earth ground stations, and other unauthorized operation and testing of radio frequency equipment. One month after the Commission denied Swarm Technologies’ application to deploy and operate four experimental satellites, Swarm Technologies launched and operated the satellites anyway, with no authorization to do so. Swarm Technologies admitted to the unauthorized launch and operation only after the Commission discovered it. During the investigation into Swarm Technologies’ practices, Swarm Technologies also identified several unauthorized weather balloon-to-ground station tests and unauthorized tests of its satellite and ground station equipment.

2. Unauthorized deployment and operation of satellites risks satellite collisions and radio frequency interference, threatening critical commercial and government satellite operations. To settle this matter, Swarm Technologies admits that it engaged in these unlawful acts, will implement a five-year compliance plan, and will pay a $900,000 civil penalty.

3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the public interest would be served by adopting the Consent Decree and terminating the referenced investigation regarding Swarm Technologies’ compliance with the satellite and radio frequency equipment laws, Sections 301 and 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act)1 , and Sections 2.805, 5.53, 25.102, 25.113 of the Commission’s rules.2

4. In the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter, we do not set for hearing the question of Swarm Technologies’ basic qualifications to hold or obtain any Commission license or authorization.3 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Act,4 the Consent Decree attached to this Order IS ADOPTED and its terms are incorporated by reference.

1 47 U.S.C. §§ 301, 302a.
2 47 CFR §§ 2.805, 5.53, 25.102, 25.113.
3 See 47 CFR § 1.93(b).
4 47 U.S.C. § 154(i).

Federal Communications Commission FCC 18-184 2

6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned matter IS TERMINATED.
7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order and Consent Decree shall be sent by first class mail and certified mail, return receipt requested, to Frank Lamancusa, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, 2020 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006-1806, counsel to Swarm Technologies, Inc.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Marlene H. Dortch Secretary
 

ipfd320

Member
Banned
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
751
Location
W.Babylon N.Y. 11704
1st off the fines should have been alot larger on the fact the company went ahead against a federal denial -2nd the rocket launch company for putting the illegal sats in the ship without an approval letter and the space agency to be investigated for approving the load and launch---the fines should have been in the billions

my question is who is covering something up and why so little of a fine and what are these sats actually doing and what for which hasent been mentioned in the decree
 

Hans13

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
997
I often wonder where does all the money go after the fines are paid?
Wherever the extortionist wants to spend the stolen money.

If it were really about law and compliance, there would be jail time. It's so patently obvious that it's about money and power.
 

ipfd320

Member
Banned
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
751
Location
W.Babylon N.Y. 11704
this is a snip from the middle of the news report in 2017 on fines taken in

And, a $100 million Federal Communications Commission fine that AT&T faces for claims it misled customers about its unlimited data plan is destined for “the U.S. Treasury for general use,” the FCC said.

Over and over, U.S. government agencies told us federal law requires them to send fines into a general pool that Congress spends as it sees fit.

More Story is Here--> Where Do Those Huge Federal Fines Go?


FCC Enforcement Fines: The Collection Process hasent been updated since 2015 Link Below
Enforcement Fines: The Collection Process
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top