FDNY EMS DB conflict?

Status
Not open for further replies.

newsnick175

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
660
Location
Denver, North Carolina
The DB lists: 483.20625/167.9 for both Bronx North Dispatch and Brooklyn North Tactical. The same comms can be heard simultaneously. What is the true BK No. Tac frequency?
 

blaze

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
225
482.98125 pl 167.9
Right, but the question is what's the correct freq for BROOKLYN N TAC? (I don't have an authoritative copy of the EMS tac channels in my own database, only the dispatch channels, so I can't help).
 

tbendick

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
422
Location
Nyc
Unless they changed it. This was a mistake and that's how the field radios were setup. How someone didn't pickup on it I don't know.
For the most part the TAC channels are not used.
 

APX7500X2

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2010
Messages
735
Location
NY/CT
Looks like it might be a PL incorrect, They use the same frequency over and over around the city
The portables are programmed for 2 watts on the tac channels so on the hip with a speaker mike your getting maybe a watt out if your lucky

CW2 Citywide 2 482.21875 R 162.2

SI Staten Island Dispatch 482.24375 R 136.5

BkC Brooklyn Central Dispatch 482.50625 R 186.2
TAC 1 Tactical 1 (simplex) 482.50625 S 85.4
QnW TAC Queens West TAC 482.50625 S 167.9

QnW Queens West Dispatch 482.51875 R 146.2
BkC TAC Brooklyn Central TAC 482.51875 S 167.9

MnN Manhattan North Dispatch 482.75625 R 151.4
QnE TAC Queens East TAC 482.75625 S 167.9

BxS Bronx South Dispatch 482.76875 R 173.8
BkS TAC Brooklyn South TAC 482.76875 S 167.9
SI TAC Staten Island TAC 482.76875 S 167.9

MnC Manhattan Central Dispatch 482.98125 R 156.7
BxN TAC Bronx North TAC 482.98125 S 167.9

QnE Queens East Dispatch 483.03125 R 141.3
MnN TAC Manhattan North TAC 483.03125 S 167.9

BxN Bronx North Dispatch 483.20625 R 167.9
BkN TAC Brooklyn North TAC 483.20625 S 167.9

MnS Manhattan South Dispatch 483.21875 R 162.2
BxS TAC Bronx South TAC 483.21875 S 167.9

BkN Brooklyn North Dispatch 483.28125 R 173.8
MnC TAC Manhattan Central TAC 483.28125 S 167.9

BkS Brooklyn South Dispatch 483.29375 R 192.8
MnS TAC Manhattan South TAC 483.29375 S 167.9
 

newsnick175

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
660
Location
Denver, North Carolina
Even though the frequencies are used many times, I can't believe they would use the same tones. Unless they are far enough apart. Once the right tone is reveled, the issue is solved.
 
Last edited:

KC2zZe

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
541
Location
Mid-Hudson Valley, NY
Database is correct.
Yes, it is.

This anomaly dates back to the Health and Hospitals Corporation days and has gone on ever since. Back in the mid-'80s 477.8625 , 85.4 -simplex - was the only Tac channel citywide (F8), as well as being the Brooklyn South / Staten Island dispatch channel (F5) - repeater. In the late '80s, 477.8625, 85.4 - repeater - became the Brooklyn Central (at one point to become the Brooklyn North for a while) channel, while still remaining F8, the Tac channel - simplex. In the early-'90s, when each borough, more or less, first got it's own Tac channel (usually simplex on the dispatch repeater output), the citywide Tac channel remained the simplex of Brooklyn Central's dispatch repeater. The early to mid-90s brought some major system "improvements" that have come and gone (800 conventional, 800 trunked) and the hostile takeover. After this latest upgrade (the move to the upper T-Band), one would have thought that this oddity would have been fixed. I'm not sure why, to this day, one of the Brooklyn channels still gets recycled elsewhere - with the exact same CTCSS tone.
 
Last edited:

tbendick

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
422
Location
Nyc
What happened is that they programmed all the tac channels using one PL tone and recycled the dispatch channels for the use as tac channels. When the new narrowband repeaters where setup they changed the output PL tones after initial configuration. I believe FDNY setup the tacs and DOITT setup the repeaters, so I think this might be where the disconnect occurred.

The tac channels are pretty much never used and almost useless. They would have been better to setup the tacs as simplex of each repeater like the old mx radios had.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top