Okay thanks. I'm confused because I have seen some ARTCC SOPs (ZOB for example) that seem to indicate their sectors only extend to FL600.
View attachment 113746
Definitely odd. Aircraft are certainly controlled up there. U2s and such are flying all the time up there, either IFR or VFR-on-Top.
Definitely odd. Aircraft are certainly controlled up there. U2s and such are flying all the time up there, either IFR or VFR-on-Top.
Are some ARTCCs perhaps using dedicated frequencies/sectors specifically for above FL600 operations that are not publised in their SOPs or on their Sector Charts ? Might explain the ZOB example ?
do other ARTCCs list another top altitude ? FL700 FL800 for example ?
Are some ARTCCs perhaps using dedicated frequencies/sectors specifically for above FL600 operations that are not publised in their SOPs or on their Sector Charts ? Might explain the ZOB example ?
Okay thanks. I'm confused because I have seen some ARTCC SOPs (ZOB for example) that seem to indicate their sectors only extend to FL600.
View attachment 113746
I have never seen a specific sector devoted to FL600 and above ops. Just not enough traffic up there to warrant it.
What got me thinking there might be, was this from the Boston (ZBW) SOP.
View attachment 113805
While they don't specifically mention FL600 and above they do single out the U-2 and B-57 and mention it's not to be used in other SUA areas. Also the location of the RCAGs are strategiaclly placed so that they would give complete coverage of all ZBW airspace from those altitudes. So while maybe not technically a "Sector" it does seem like it might be set up to cover that airspace ?
Probably useful for any aircraft where changing frequencies as they cross Boston Center coverage area is work intensive
And probably only used once every 10 years ? I've never heard ZBW using 321.300 myself or seen reports of it active. Anyone ? I'll keep watching for some NASA U-2s or B-57s up here, but I'm not holding my breath. Taking another look through the ZBW SOP I see they do indicate that some sectors, and I quote, "control to FL600", so I'm still skeptical how the sectorization actually works up there.
Do you have a link to the Boston Center SOP you are referencing ?
Sorry I don't have a link. You can obtain a copy by filing an FAA FOIA Request.
Okay so just to confirm - the copy you have was obtained via FOIA ?
Additionally the document at this link starting at 9-2-13 (page 400 of the PDF) has some good information.
Yes.
Thanks. That helps clarify a few things.
Special use frequencies (296.7, 321.3, 364.8 and 369.9MHz)
Interesting. Looking at the FAA ARTCC Facilities (AFF) File you can see how these 4 frequencis have been "assigned to ARTCCs in such a manner that adjacent ARTCCs will not have the same frequency."
269.700 = ZDC, ZDV, ZMA, ZME, ZOA
321.300 = ZBW, ZHU, ZSE
364.800 = ZAU, ZFW, ZJX, ZLC, ZNY
369.900 = ZLA, ZOB, ZTL
ZAB, ZAN, ZID, ZMP don't show a listing for one of the 4 above. That might be because the AFF, which is known for many errors and omissions, just forgot to include them ? ZAN could be any of them, but using the "can't be adjacent rule" could only give this result.
321.300 = ZID, ZMP
364.800 = ZAB
I guess they can't get in trouble if they just don't update the information. The reason for that statement. They specifically mention a Canberra.
Well one of them was flying on Monday (20th), so that info is not out of date. N926NA.