First BCD396XT Has arrived, first look and discussion!

Status
Not open for further replies.

DaveIN

Founders Curmudgen
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
6,515
Location
West Michigan
I monitored several towers on the Indiana SAFE-T system this weekend. I must say the decoded audio from a mixed-mode system has improved very much. I did have some weak signal "motorboating", but when the signal was there it was solid and clear with low error rates. I like the fact that I can set the talkgroup as digital only for ID Scan, I just wish I had the option for ID Search as well. NAC reporting worked well on the SAFE-T mixed-mode system and on the conventional P25 systems from the Kentucky state police.
 
Last edited:

DaveIN

Founders Curmudgen
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
6,515
Location
West Michigan
I haven't seen anyone mention using the ATTenuator yet (although I am on page 5 out of the current 10+ pages of the thread so far). It might seem counterintuitive to some users, but the attenuator might be more useful, especially in high-RF environments, than adding a "better" antenna. Pulling more signal into the scanner's front end might actually make things worse.

I have not used the attenuator too much yet. I usually didn't need it for the 396 classic except for extream cases. I have used the IFX (intermediate frequency exchange) however with some success.
 

UPMan

In Memoriam
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
13,296
Location
Arlington, TX
GPS channel control on conventional systems is done at the channel group level (just as it is with trunked systems).
 

DaveIN

Founders Curmudgen
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
6,515
Location
West Michigan
GPS channel control on conventional systems is done at the channel group level (just as it is with trunked systems).

Scott and I were talking about the idea that it would be great to have this feature at the "system" level as well. Then you could have the GPS turn the system on at a location specified.
 
D

DaveNF2G

Guest
P25 Lpf?

I was reading the reference guide (thanks to whoever made it available) and came across a reference to a "P25 Low-Pass Filter." I found no description or explanation in the guide. What is this feature all about?
 

UPMan

In Memoriam
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
13,296
Location
Arlington, TX
On some systems you can hear a tone that is an artifact of the the 4096 Hz sampling rate. Turning on this filter effectively filters out the tone.
 

DaveIN

Founders Curmudgen
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
6,515
Location
West Michigan
I was reading the reference guide (thanks to whoever made it available) and came across a reference to a "P25 Low-Pass Filter." I found no description or explanation in the guide. What is this feature all about?

As I understand it, it's a "low pass filter" for ~4KHz noise on P25 channels. I've been running it on all the time with no ill effects.
 

GTO_04

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Messages
1,937
Location
Noblesville, IN
I monitored several towers on the Indiana SAFE-T system this weekend. I must say the decoded audio from a mixed-mode system has improved very much. I did have some weak signal "motorboating", but when the signal was there it was solid and clear with low error rates. I like the fact that I can set the talkgroup as digital only for ID Scan, I just wish I had the option for ID Search as well. NAC reporting worked well on the SAFE-T mixed-mode system and on the conventional P25 systems from the Kentucky state police.

That's the feedback I'm looking for! I am very interested in how it performs on SAFE-T.


Take a look at UPMan's Avatar and here: Image:BCD396T BL.jpg - The RadioReference Wiki

Thanks. I assume that also applies to the keyboard backlight then.

GTO_04
 

JANFINE

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
247
Location
MIRAMAR, FL
Re: Gps

I have a Garmin V that worked with the BC15 and BC996.
Is it compatible with the BC346xt?
I've tried it with a null modem between the 2 cables and with the GPS & Scanner set to the same baud rate. The GPS is set to NEMA IN/OUT.

Could it be a old/bad null modem or is the GPS not compatible with the newer scanners?

Thanks.
 

UPMan

In Memoriam
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
13,296
Location
Arlington, TX
The GPS should be fine. It is likeliest either that you haven't set the scanner's port to 4800 bps or that the null modem/gender changer isn't in the correct configuration. (Well, since you checked the baud rate, then null modem/gender changer is likeliest for you...).
 

DaveIN

Founders Curmudgen
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
6,515
Location
West Michigan
Jan, make sure you turn the control channel output off as well. This one is going to bite a bunch of people UPMan. Could this feature be changed to automatically turn off the control channel output when the baud rate is changed or something similar?
 

JANFINE

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
247
Location
MIRAMAR, FL
Re: Gps

Got it. Thanks. I had a bad null modem. I had bought it when the BC245 first came out so I could clone other peoples radios to mine. I was thinking about turning off the output of the Control Channel. I didn't think it was bi-directional. Thanks.
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
Just a note im in love with this 396xt what a huge diff from the 396t nice job There Paul :)
it now holds its own with the gre 500 and or 106 if not better p25 audio then both of those
jeff
 

KC1UA

Scan New England Janitor/Maintenance
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Messages
2,088
Location
Marstons Mills, Cape Cod, Massachusetts
GPS channel control on conventional systems is done at the channel group level (just as it is with trunked systems).

I always understood that to be the case, yes, but I apparently was wrong in my thinking that it was also possible to set it at the system level, as was the case with the 996T and BCT15. I see a distinct benefit to this feature, but I still think it would be nice to have the per system setting as well.

Freescan has not developed to the point of being able to support this feature. Once software can accomplish the programming it'll become a lot easier.

Thanks.
 

soncorn

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2003
Messages
546
Location
Fort Worth, TX
GPS channel control on conventional systems is done at the channel group level (just as it is with trunked systems).

So this means that instead of assigning coordinates to "sites" on trunked systems or to entire conventional systems I will be able to assign coordinates to groups instead?

That sounds so much better than what I have been doing for the 996T which is multiple systems to cover one real system based on police districts, etc.
 

UPMan

In Memoriam
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
13,296
Location
Arlington, TX
On trunked systems, you will be able to set coordinates both for sites (so you can select the optimal tower for your location) and channel groups (so you can select the appropriate channels for your location) independently.
 

K5RYA

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
88
Location
Spring, TX
On trunked systems, you will be able to set coordinates both for sites (so you can select the optimal tower for your location) and channel groups (so you can select the appropriate channels for your location) independently.

I noticed that. I thought maybe I had missed something on my 996T and went back and it looks like the 996T only supports location info for sites, not channel groups like the XT's. Do you know if we will see an update for the 996T that will bring this functionality or will we have to wait for a XT version of the 996 for this feature?
 

AZScanner

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
3,342
Location
Somewhere in this room. Right now, you're very col
Still no user reports from Phoenix?

Hey Paul, were any of your beta testers from Phoenix? How did it do on the RWC system?

I hate to keep harping on this but $500 is a lot of money so I want to hear from others before I decide between this radio or the 346.

Thanks,
-AZ
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top