Franklin County radio upgrade
- Thread starter kinerity
- Start date
- Status
According to the RR DB Adams has..
1.21 NAC 1E1
1.22 NAC 1E2
is that not correct?
Also there is no FCC license in PA/MD that I could find for 866.8125 1.1 neighbor
Dauphin has sites 1.1 thru 1.9 and no NAC's reported.. All UHF 400-500 MHz range
I suspect that reported neighbor 1.1 is an error that will disappear when things settle down.. IDK
1.21 NAC 1E1
1.22 NAC 1E2
is that not correct?
Also there is no FCC license in PA/MD that I could find for 866.8125 1.1 neighbor
Dauphin has sites 1.1 thru 1.9 and no NAC's reported.. All UHF 400-500 MHz range
I suspect that reported neighbor 1.1 is an error that will disappear when things settle down.. IDK
I saw it as well, but it was stated by channel number (which I haven't decoded yet)According to the RR DB Adams has..
1.21 NAC 1E1
1.22 NAC 1E2
is that not correct?
Also there is no FCC license in PA/MD that I could find for 866.8125 1.1 neighbor
Dauphin has sites 1.1 thru 1.9 and no NAC's reported.. All UHF 400-500 MHz range
I suspect that reported neighbor 1.1 is an error that will disappear when things settle down.. IDK
Updates to the database are forthcoming. Of course, we need monitors to submit data and not just discuss it in the forums. If submission are made with updated data, they can be more easily worked on by admins vs having to go back through forums to mine data.
Looks like the RRDB data update for Franklin Co has the RFSS and Site numbers reversed. Should be RFSS 1 for Site 031 and Site 032. I am also of the opinion that the individual county systems should be combined into one regional system, noting that they share the same SYSID - 1E8 and WACN - BEE00. The current listing scheme can cause data downloading misbehavior in some software applications because they evaluate SYSID as unique values. It can cause band plans errors. I'd submit the correction, but I don't feel comfortable doing so because I don't monitor this system very often.
BM82557
Member
Well Franklin County finally got the Big E covering all LE according to the Data base, A sad day indeed.
Can an admin please fix the error for the Adams county TGs? Adams is T and TE, not D and DE.
This has been corrected. For future use please use the submit button at the top of the database page. Not all admins monitor the forums.
The reason I posted this publicly is because I am not in range of Adams to confirm that they are not phase 1. I wanted people to see my comment and correct it if it's wrong.
BM82557
Member
Site neighbors for sites 1.31 and 1.32 -
Has anyone with a TRX-1 had any luck getting this new upgrade loaded onto their scanner?
My guess is, based on the location of Shippensburg, that their radios, which once always locked onto one site, can now roam to several sites which are in good range. One reason why multi-site needs much tweaking over simulcast.
On a sidenote, they're calling it SCI-Net... which made me think of only one thing when I pronounced it aloud...
Attachments
ed0202
Newbie
Does anyone know the P25 channel ID plan/band plan for the new system?
BM82557
Member
From DSDPlus FastLane -
Network: BEE00.1E8 ; South Central PA Interop Network
Bandplan #0: Base=851.00625 Offset=-45 Spacing=6.25 BW=12.5
Bandplan #1: Base=762.00625 Offset=+30 Spacing=6.25 BW=12.5
Bandplan #2: Base=851.0125 Offset=-45 Spacing=12.5 BW=12.5 Slots=2
Bandplan #3: Base=762.00625 Offset=+30 Spacing=12.5 BW=12.5 Slots=2
Bandplan #4: Base=450.00625 Offset=+5 Spacing=6.25 BW=12.5
Bandplan #5: Base=456.25625 Offset=+5 Spacing=6.25 BW=12.5
Bandplan #6: Base=494.00625 Offset=+3 Spacing=6.25 BW=12.5
Bandplan #7: Base=500.00625 Offset=+3 Spacing=6.25 BW=12.5
ed0202
Newbie
Worked perfectly. I had the wrong base. Thanks so much.
What scanner are you using?
tvengr
Well Known Member
Can you attach your configuration file so that I can check it for problems?
- Status
