Google Chrome and RadioReference.com

[eorange]

I am using Google Chrome to browse this site. So far, forums, database entries, clickable maps, RR Locations, Premium PDF and CSV reports, and the Wiki seem OK.

Maybe this could be made a sticky to help document any issues found with this site and Chrome.

 

[WayneH]

I still wish some websites would support Firefox, but then that's what IETab is for.

Maybe if Chrome doesn't work for this site, complain in the Chrome forums.

 

[SCPD]

and its only beta.. So why waste time & effort now??

 

[kfcrosby]

and its only beta.. So why waste time & effort now??

Because it's there (like Mt Everest)

In my prelim testing Chrome is MUCH faster than anything else with JAVA. A bit slower than most with Flash, especially flash games, and renders much like FF does on most all of the web pages I use. The new IE8 will break free of the older M$ web format, so those websites that are still using the older M$ formats will have to change.

Kevin

 

[eorange]

and its only beta.. So why waste time & effort now??

Gmail has been in beta for years. At that point, "beta" is just a label.

Chrome will likely be a popular choice, given Google's track record for simple and reliable software.

Finally - even though this is highly unlikely - who here would want this site to be labeled as "not working with Google's Chrome"? No one.

 

[mtindor]

Yeah it's beta, but I bit. It's clearly not ready for prime time. I guess i'm spoiled by Google - I like everything Google, contrary to how many feel. But it has a problem displaying something on most websites I'm on, and can't render many in any sort of reasonable fashion. If you're thinking about downloading it, don't waste your time right now. Stick with Firefox

mike

 

[blantonl]

I still wish some websites would support Firefox, but then that's what IETab is for.

Maybe if Chrome doesn't work for this site, complain in the Chrome forums.

Ummmm... :roll:

He was reporting that it works well for this site. Jeeze Wayneeeee...

That's because of the superior coding skills of yours truly :roll::lol::lol::lol:

 

[iMONITOR]

CHROMESPOT
http://chromespot.com/

 

[bezking]

Ummmm... :roll:

He was reporting that it works well for this site. Jeeze Wayneeeee...

That's because of the superior coding skills of yours truly :roll::lol::lol::lol:

Oy. Time for some geek humor:

$radioreference_members = /* number of rr members */;
$lindsay_ego = 1;

for($i;$i>$radioreference_members;$i++) {
 $lindsay_ego = $lindsay_ego * 4;
}

:lol:

Party on, Garth.

 

[WayneH]

$radioreference_members = /* number of rr members */;
$lindsay_ego = 1;

for($i;$i>$radioreference_members;$i++) {
 $lindsay_ego = $lindsay_ego * 4;
}

$$$$$$$

 

[blantonl]

bezking, you've got an error in your code. Let me fix it for you:

$radioreference_members = /* number of rr members */;
$lindsay_ego = 18558123461;

for($i;$i>$radioreference_members;$i++) {
 $lindsay_ego = $lindsay_ego * 4;
}

 

[bezking]

My apologies Lindsay. Thanks for the correction. :lol:

 

[DonS]

Oy. Time for some geek humor:

$radioreference_members = /* number of rr members */;
$lindsay_ego = 1;

for($i;$i>$radioreference_members;$i++) {
 $lindsay_ego = $lindsay_ego * 4;
}

So.... Lindsay's ego is 1, no matter how many "rr members" there are (non-negative)? Or does the ">" operator in PHP mean something other than what it means in most non-PHP expressions?

 

[blantonl]

You know, now that I look at that code, my ego would NOT be inflated.

Let's try this again:

$radioreference_members = /* number of rr members */;
$lindsay_ego = 1;

for($i;$i<=$radioreference_members;$i++) {
 $lindsay_ego = $lindsay_ego * 4;
}

Bezking, I was going to grant you access to the SVN - but now there is no way in hell you are getting access to my code ;-)

 

[eorange]

bezking, you've got an error in your code. Let me fix it for you:

$radioreference_members = /* number of rr members */;
$lindsay_ego = 18558123461;

for($i;$i>$radioreference_members;$i++) {
 $lindsay_ego = $lindsay_ego * 4;
}

A 32 bit ego can only be -2147483648 to 2147483647.

 

[DonS]

You know, now that I look at that code, my ego would NOT be inflated.

Sheesh.

You had to look at it twice? And you're talking about people having access to your code?

 

[DonS]

A 32 bit ego can only be -2147483648 to 2147483647.

Who says Lindsay's ego is limited by 32 bits? Perhaps the PHP interpreter in Lindsay's brain has googleplex-bit integers.

 

[hoser147]

Easy Boys

Looks like a TechnoSlamfest here :lol:

 

[tonsoffun]

I don't know about others, but I got a headache wondering what you guys are writing.... I guess I will learn someday, maybe Bezking can teach me Would you Ben? I will bring the BEER lol.

 

[bezking]

So.... Lindsay's ego is 1, no matter how many "rr members" there are (non-negative)? Or does the ">" operator in PHP mean something other than what it means in most non-PHP expressions?

Don-

we are taking the number of members and multiplying Lindsay's ego by 4 for each member.