Gosh, And we go to all that trouble with Moblie Mounts...

Status
Not open for further replies.

AlmostHandy

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
Location
Mohave County
Wow, I would have never guessed!

Do you have to manipulate your antenna at all, or does it work at the stock length?



Are you guys putting me on? lol For all the trouble and expense that people go to for mobile antenna mounts, it just seems like such a silly thing!
 

W6KRU

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
3,463
Reaction score
86
Location
Vista, CA
Years ago, I used to install gear in highway patrol vehicles. These splitters for the broadcast antenna were a standard item for hooking up the scanners.
 

mancow

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Feb 19, 2003
Messages
6,937
Reaction score
1,107
Location
N.E. Kansas
I think they called them Motorola style plugs. RadioShack sold adapters for them and may still have them.
 

AlmostHandy

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
Location
Mohave County
Oh yeah!! About ten years ago, my little brother found an old base station scanner at a yard sale. It had that same kind of Car Radio Antenna socket. I thought that was odd.
 

blinddog50

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2005
Messages
254
Reaction score
0
Location
Undisclosed urban location.
These things actually work quite well.
There are cables made with a Motorola female on one end and a bnc on the other.
I use one on my Rubicon and works as well as a 'scanner' antenna.
Ever have a tv with a broken antenna and you used a bent coat hanger an antenna?
Think of the bandwidth it had to cover.
People get hung up with too many theories over just receive antennas.
You need a piece of wire.
 

W6KRU

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
3,463
Reaction score
86
Location
Vista, CA
These things actually work quite well.
There are cables made with a Motorola female on one end and a bnc on the other.
I use one on my Rubicon and works as well as a 'scanner' antenna.
Ever have a tv with a broken antenna and you used a bent coat hanger an antenna?
Think of the bandwidth it had to cover.
People get hung up with too many theories over just receive antennas.
You need a piece of wire.

I used to think the same way but some time with an antenna tuner and a set of HF antennas to test told me otherwise.
 

fineshot1

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
2,531
Reaction score
21
Location
NJ USA (Republic of NJ)
I tried using one of these many years ago. Was so so for the scanner(uniden 760) but was absolutely terrible for the car radio fm reception. After several months out of frustration I ripped it out and installed another lousy idea - a cellular glass mount. This worked ok for local vhf and uhf but on 800/900 it worked too good and got nothing but front end overload from all the cell and nextel sites. Now I just use my ham gear with dedicated memories for the pd, fd & ems stuff I like to listen to with no 800/900 listening(no need for this range anymore) and enjoy my fm.
 

LordJ

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
635
Reaction score
1
Location
South-Eastern, Ontario
I have to agree with fineshot1, they worked better than the rubber duck, but you have to sacrifice fm reception. I'm sure someone can make a better one. You could try to use a mobile mounted drop amp to split it, would eliminate the rf loss...hm... project for my next vehicle I think..
 

benjaminarthurt

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 12, 2005
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
Location
Liverpool NY
I built something similar and ran it in my vehicle for a few years, I used a pre-amp on the Scanner though. All the parts needed are (were?) available at RadioShack. I actually built mine in the stock room when I worked there.

Worked well on 46.12 my counties fire dispatch, and up through VHF was pretty decent. UHF and the county wide 800 were awful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top