bwigg
Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2005
- Messages
- 79
I was wondering if anybody has tested the sensitivity of the new BCT-15 with a service monitor yet?
I am holding off on the purchase of one until someone can verify it's not deaf like the BCD396T. After I purchased the BCD396T, I had get a PRO-96 just so I could continue to monitor my areas VHF and VHF airband comms. I can understand there must be a balance between overall senstivity vs intermod/overload but the PRO-96 hears receives fringe comms much better.
The new unit has lots of good features and looks good, but if it doesn't have good sensitivity it will be useless in my application.
How about intermod rejection and front end overload? I have a PRO-2055 that works very well, but I had to add a notch cavity tuned to 152.480mhz, a 3 db pad and a FM notch filter just to get rid of all the pager crap and front end overload.
I am holding off on the purchase of one until someone can verify it's not deaf like the BCD396T. After I purchased the BCD396T, I had get a PRO-96 just so I could continue to monitor my areas VHF and VHF airband comms. I can understand there must be a balance between overall senstivity vs intermod/overload but the PRO-96 hears receives fringe comms much better.
The new unit has lots of good features and looks good, but if it doesn't have good sensitivity it will be useless in my application.
How about intermod rejection and front end overload? I have a PRO-2055 that works very well, but I had to add a notch cavity tuned to 152.480mhz, a 3 db pad and a FM notch filter just to get rid of all the pager crap and front end overload.