Here is an example of encryption hampering law enforcement operations.

Peter_SD911

Scan Sexy
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
129
Location
Norcal-Socal
Does CHP want its' personnel to take over pursuits? Due to liability, generally not. If the violence is proven, then sure they will chase an active shooter. A deranged or EDP mom who wants her kid? I'd say no.

CHP will usually takeover a local pursuit when it's on the freeway.
And...
In most cases there is air support available and CHP interfaces with the local air support because ASTERIA, ABLE and STAR-90 all have CHP lo-band Socal channels.


Road conditions were crap, and the weather also was super sucky.
I was shocked at what I heard, but fully understand why CHP didn't want to be involved at the time.

Just too dangerous for all involved.
 

Peter_SD911

Scan Sexy
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
129
Location
Norcal-Socal
Liability, not most crimes, control pursuits by any agency.

It's not the crime that dictates...but you are correct about the liability.

This is why the pursuing officer and his supervisors are always re-evaluating the road conditions (speed,weather and how much traffic on the road) to reduce the chance of innocent people getting hurt.

On a normal day CHP would have taken that chase and YES, there would be air support involved. One of the local airships would have called the pursuit, and everyone would have a little "breathing room".

Not this time.

Nobody wants some dead innocent people due to some well intention officer crashing while trying to establish communications in the middle of blinding rain.

As much as I hate the encryption...it was NOT an issue here. And it's really not even a "dispatcher training" issue because conditions all-around were crap. No luxury of air support "due to conditions".
 

JethrowJohnson

Active Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2022
Messages
900
Location
Marietta OH
It's not the crime that dictates...but you are correct about the liability.

This is why the pursuing officer and his supervisors are always re-evaluating the road conditions (speed,weather and how much traffic on the road) to reduce the chance of innocent people getting hurt.

On a normal day CHP would have taken that chase and YES, there would be air support involved. One of the local airships would have called the pursuit, and everyone would have a little "breathing room".

Not this time.

Nobody wants some dead innocent people due to some well intention officer crashing while trying to establish communications in the middle of blinding rain.

As much as I hate the encryption...it was NOT an issue here. And it's really not even a "dispatcher training" issue because conditions all-around were crap. No luxury of air support "due to conditions".
I agree. What county(ies) was/were this again?
 

Ensnared

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
4,478
Location
Waco, Texas
I saw that video too, I think the OP thought it was because of encryption because OnScene.TV YouTube channel said so in the description of that video. But the way they worded it was misleading I think. I'm not sure if it was a typo, or whoever wrote it really thought this was true or what, but it said that all agencies that were in the pursuit used encryption which made interoperability difficult. That isn't exactly how they said it but that's what it sounded like to me. Anyway, I think the reporters were using that as a reason against encryption because they use scanners to go to scenes and record stuff (which is sort of questionable in my opinion in regards to safety and privacy, but whatever) I haven't heard of them getting in any trouble for it.

I have noticed that some news agencies don't elaborate on the source of the radio transmissions.

I wrote an open letter to a smaller city in Texas who encrypted everything. I mentioned that citizens would be clueless about dangerous situations such as a crook being "on the ground" within a neighborhood perimeter. There are times when LE tells citizens to stay in the house, but not always. This is why I believe some dispatch channels should be open to the public. "Responsible" citizens can help report sightings to LE and assist in LE efforts.
 
Last edited:

inigo88

California DB Admin
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
1,999
Location
San Diego, CA
Yeah I hate encryption as much as the next guy, but San Diego Sheriff has so far been very good about patching an otherwise encrypted dispatch channel to an unencrypted law enforcement interop channel for pursuits and other incidents where good multi-agency interop trumps the desire for encryption.

SDPD will use their patch talkgroup to link to the CHP Orange, SD Sheriff will link to LE North and LE South command, etc. The air units ABLE and ASTREA are also listening to about 5 ground radios simultaneously and are very good and relaying traffic back and forth, or calling pursuits on trunking and CHP low band more or less simultaneously. The officers will VERY rarely ever use a simplex statewide interop channel like the 8CALL/8TAC channels because doing so takes their radio off the trunking system and they lose the ability to priority scan their dispatch channel.

…and also a lot of them don’t know how, which is a separate issue. :)
 

Anderegg

Enter text in this field
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
2,672
Location
San Diego
Just to be very clear...
When CHP was advised by RSO of the chase, the CHP supervisor on TAN frequency REFUSED to takeover the pursuit.
It was raining like h*ll and I assume that was the real reason.

I recall the dispatcher saying...
"RSO wants us to take over the pursuit BEFORE RSO loses contact with their units."
That was the end of the discussion, and there was NO mention of encryption issues.

But here is the reality of the situation with Riverside and Orange counties...
I have NEVER heard a successful pursuit "patch" from RSO into San Diego and vice-versa even before any encryption, unless a CHP or San Diego law helo was involved to interface on lo-band with CHP.

They have the ability of CALAW80 (CLEMARS800) but I'm not sure if any of the ground units can find it quickly on the radio deck.

CHP refused to take it over....

Go pull the tapes.

Ditto this. Typically what ends up happening is the units once they go south out of RSO radio range, they switch to cell phones...same for many Orange County pursuits. They DO patch on CALAW8, but if you have ever tried to monitor this much less utilize it, you will know this would be akin to trying to talk from DTSD on a Buofeng to someone next to you using a VHF repeater located on Mt Lukens in Los Angeles. I remember when they were doing a track of some OIS guy (Marquez) that eventually ended in a dumpster hostage OIS SWAT at San Diego HS a few years ago, the units were on CALAW8 and on my APX4500 in car with rooftop 800 antenna parked at the AM PM off the 15 and 76, I had ZERO RX of the repeater, and the units were only a few exits away from me.

Paul
 
Top