JethrowJohnson
Active Member
Where do I look to find them?Go pull the tapes.
Where do I look to find them?Go pull the tapes.
Does CHP want its' personnel to take over pursuits? Due to liability, generally not. If the violence is proven, then sure they will chase an active shooter. A deranged or EDP mom who wants her kid? I'd say no.
Where do I look to find them?
Liability, not most crimes, control pursuits by any agency.
I agree. What county(ies) was/were this again?It's not the crime that dictates...but you are correct about the liability.
This is why the pursuing officer and his supervisors are always re-evaluating the road conditions (speed,weather and how much traffic on the road) to reduce the chance of innocent people getting hurt.
On a normal day CHP would have taken that chase and YES, there would be air support involved. One of the local airships would have called the pursuit, and everyone would have a little "breathing room".
Not this time.
Nobody wants some dead innocent people due to some well intention officer crashing while trying to establish communications in the middle of blinding rain.
As much as I hate the encryption...it was NOT an issue here. And it's really not even a "dispatcher training" issue because conditions all-around were crap. No luxury of air support "due to conditions".
I saw that video too, I think the OP thought it was because of encryption because OnScene.TV YouTube channel said so in the description of that video. But the way they worded it was misleading I think. I'm not sure if it was a typo, or whoever wrote it really thought this was true or what, but it said that all agencies that were in the pursuit used encryption which made interoperability difficult. That isn't exactly how they said it but that's what it sounded like to me. Anyway, I think the reporters were using that as a reason against encryption because they use scanners to go to scenes and record stuff (which is sort of questionable in my opinion in regards to safety and privacy, but whatever) I haven't heard of them getting in any trouble for it.
Just to be very clear...
When CHP was advised by RSO of the chase, the CHP supervisor on TAN frequency REFUSED to takeover the pursuit.
It was raining like h*ll and I assume that was the real reason.
I recall the dispatcher saying...
"RSO wants us to take over the pursuit BEFORE RSO loses contact with their units."
That was the end of the discussion, and there was NO mention of encryption issues.
But here is the reality of the situation with Riverside and Orange counties...
I have NEVER heard a successful pursuit "patch" from RSO into San Diego and vice-versa even before any encryption, unless a CHP or San Diego law helo was involved to interface on lo-band with CHP.
They have the ability of CALAW80 (CLEMARS800) but I'm not sure if any of the ground units can find it quickly on the radio deck.
CHP refused to take it over....
Go pull the tapes.