Follow up: Ok, I decided to make a real life experiment. I went out and brought my HP-1(E) in from my vehicle to the house, hooked it up, and did something that I have never even considered doing before (owned over a year).
1) I choose to enter my location as Zip Code 85053
2) I choose to use the entire HPDB onboard the radio.
3) I choose to open all available “Service Types”.
4) I choose to set the “Range” to the maximum setting of “30.0” miles
The radio informs me that I have chosen to scan 2261 individual frequencies. There is no easy way for me to see a list of these 2261 frequencies. There is also no reason for me to do so. Since I have lived at the same location for more than 30 years, and in the same community for 71 years, I know that there are only about 40 of these frequencies that I would like to scan at once.
As an experiment, I go back to the “Menu” and change the “Range” to “0.00” miles. The number of scanned channels drops to 1511. Now I will try another experiment:
1) I choose to enter my location as Lat/Long
2) I choose to use the entire HPDB onboard the radio.
3) I choose to open all available “Service Types”.
4) I choose to set the “Range” to the maximum setting of “30.0” miles
The radio informs me that I have chosen to scan 2261 individual frequencies. As an experiment, I go back to the “Menu” and change the “Range” to “0.00” miles. The number of scanned channels drops to 1511. Same as Zip, hmnn? Now I will try another experiment:
1) I choose to enter my location as “City”
2) I choose to use the entire HPDB onboard the radio.
3) I choose to open all available “Service Types”.
4) I choose to set the “Range” to the maximum setting of “30.0” miles
The radio informs me that I have chosen to scan 2270 individual frequencies. As an experiment, I go back to the “Menu” and change the “Range” to “0.00” miles. The number of scanned channels drops to 1513. At least a difference, lol.
Ok, now I/we know, lol! Now for a personal opinion that is completely irrelevant to anything, lol:
I think anyone, in a stationary location, that is not at a strange unknown place (like when travelling to a new, unexpected location) that uses the whole HPDB along with either the Zip, Geo, or City choice as a way to control the radios output, is confessing to an extreme lack of imagination, extreme naiveté, or some other worse mental condition (the kind that can’t be changed).
All of the above, and my words in any previous responses to this thread, should not in any way be construed as a statement against the HP-1/HP-1(E) scanners. If a new/better scanner does not popup on the market real soon, I will be getting a second HP-1(E).