Hoosier SAFE-T Thread 2013-2018

Status
Not open for further replies.

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
14,999
Reaction score
1,809
Location
Indianapolis, IN
All ranges for TG Groups now set except for the Fountain/Warren Regional, and the INDOC stuff. I will get the DOC stuff later, and try to figure out how to set the FWR one.
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,704
Reaction score
9,604
Location
Central Indiana
The intersection of CR 260 W and CR 600 N in Fountain County is about as close to the geographic mean of the combined Fountain/Warren Counties as you can get.

From the northern border of Warren County to the southern border of Fountain County is about 36 miles. That intersection is about 18 miles from either border.

From the IN/IL state line to the eastern border of Fountain County, which also lines up with the eastern border of Warren County, is about 23 miles. That intersection is about 11.5 miles from either border.

The coordinates of that intersection are N 40 12.891, W 087 18.849.
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
14,999
Reaction score
1,809
Location
Indianapolis, IN
Due to the circles we have to use... I put the radius at 36 miles... Since that is the ONLY way to hit both North/South borders... Yes it dos grab a huge chunk of IL, and surrounding counties, but until we enable an more accurate poly framing that is the best I can do. To those who will complain, save it, zip up a better way, and send it to Tom and Lindsay.
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
14,999
Reaction score
1,809
Location
Indianapolis, IN
I will get more of the FCC licenses and other data locked in Tuesday when I am off again.
 

c_snyder

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2016
Messages
145
Reaction score
6
Is there any reason why unitrunker would show the wrong control channel for a tower? I'm trying to enter a site into unitrunker with the control channel parked at 853.4125 but when I click start the site window pops up and it has 853.8875 in red. 8875 is the control channel of a neighbor site and this doesn't make sense. I've confirmed the signal is 853.4125 with an SDR program.

Everything else checks out fine, NAC and voice frequencies.
 

c_snyder

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2016
Messages
145
Reaction score
6
Nevermind my last. Apparently it was an issue on my end with unitrunker.
 

kevin.r

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
86
Reaction score
18
Location
Bloomington, Indiana
Unknown TG 10249

Can anyone help identify talkgroup 10249 on the SAFE-T P25 system?

Several days ago there was a lot of activity on this TG on the Bloomington site. Most of it was encrypted, but there was at least one radio transmitting in the clear.

All of the RIDs had a 99 prefix. Does 99 indicate a Federal user? I've only logged a handful of 99 RIDs on the Bloomington site.

My guess for 10249 was going to be USMS, but I see they're already listed as talkgroup 21182.

Thanks.
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
14,999
Reaction score
1,809
Location
Indianapolis, IN
Remember the following Federal agencies all have SAFE-T access - FBI, DEA, USMS, ICE, USFS, BATF, USF&W... And there are a couple of SAFE-T radios for TSA users for interop if needed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JStemann

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
507
Reaction score
18
Location
SE Indiana
Due to the circles we have to use... I put the radius at 36 miles... Since that is the ONLY way to hit both North/South borders... Yes it dos grab a huge chunk of IL, and surrounding counties, but until we enable an more accurate poly framing that is the best I can do. To those who will complain, save it, zip up a better way, and send it to Tom and Lindsay.

Milf, why worry about limiting the talkgroup groupings to just their "county coverage"? Why not just set them to the range of the state system? Having the talkgroup grouping cover a large area doesn't slow scanning. By setting the groupings to cover such a small area, we now have to increase the range we scan. This will slow scanning by adding unuseable and/or unnecessary sites.

In my case, I live very close to Versailles. Ripley, Jennings, Dearborn and Ohio counties regularly affiliate with the Versailles site. Jefferson, Franklin and Switzerland do as well, but not as often. I can set the range to 0 miles (for example) and monitor all of those talkgroups. With the talkgroup groupings reduced to their current ranges, I now have to increase the range to 5,10 (or more) miles. This also unlocks a whole lot of sites that are way out of range. This seriously slows scanning.

Jeff.
 

eaf1956

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
3,511
Reaction score
1,011
Location
Evansville, IN
Yankeetown Tower...Just exactly who uses this tower? All I ever hear are regional dispatches and WARRICK County. I don't hear Dist 34 or Dist 35 State Traffic. You would think Dist 34 would use the tower at the very least.
 

eaf1956

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
3,511
Reaction score
1,011
Location
Evansville, IN
Milf, why worry about limiting the talkgroup groupings to just their "county coverage"? Why not just set them to the range of the state system? Having the talkgroup grouping cover a large area doesn't slow scanning. By setting the groupings to cover such a small area, we now have to increase the range we scan. This will slow scanning by adding unuseable and/or unnecessary sites.

In my case, I live very close to Versailles. Ripley, Jennings, Dearborn and Ohio counties regularly affiliate with the Versailles site. Jefferson, Franklin and Switzerland do as well, but not as often. I can set the range to 0 miles (for example) and monitor all of those talkgroups. With the talkgroup groupings reduced to their current ranges, I now have to increase the range to 5,10 (or more) miles. This also unlocks a whole lot of sites that are way out of range. This seriously slows scanning.

Jeff.


Agree....I always just change the tower ranges so that I only get towers I can actually hear while mobile. More pressing would be accurate tower locations and proper ranges.
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
14,999
Reaction score
1,809
Location
Indianapolis, IN
Handbook rules.

Sent from my LG-K330 using Tapatalk
 

W3AXL

RF Engineer
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 2, 2015
Messages
91
Reaction score
68
Location
Indiana
Have a barebones setup here in Laporte County monitoring the safe-t site. Seeing unit ids with prefix 46 (Laporte County) calling on talkgroups in the 0x3160 range.

IDs I've seen so far are 4610191, 4610192, and 4610313. Unfortunately I only have one other SDR, but I'll program any talkgroups I see into my radio and listen in.
 

vocoder

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2017
Messages
724
Reaction score
108
Location
Indiana
Have a barebones setup here in Laporte County monitoring the safe-t site. Seeing unit ids with prefix 46 (Laporte County) calling on talkgroups in the 0x3160 range.

IDs I've seen so far are 4610191, 4610192, and 4610313. Unfortunately I only have one other SDR, but I'll program any talkgroups I see into my radio and listen in.

Could you give us some complete tg examples
Like 10754, 10782
 

W3AXL

RF Engineer
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 2, 2015
Messages
91
Reaction score
68
Location
Indiana
So far I've only seen TGs 12640 and 12648. 12640 had traffic for a few hours today with units talking about locations in Michigan City. 12648 has only had one hit so far but had many joins over a few hours. That's all I was able to gather after two hours of listening.
 

WB9EMT

Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2004
Messages
49
Reaction score
3
Location
LaPorte, IN
Looks like 12623-12648 are assigned to LaPorte county. I'm assuming 12641 is County fire tac 1 and 12645 is County fire ops 4, based on listening to units talking.

Sent from my SM-J320P using Tapatalk
 

W3AXL

RF Engineer
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 2, 2015
Messages
91
Reaction score
68
Location
Indiana
Sounds like a Laporte County drug team of some kind talking on TGs 126439 and 12640. Talking about meetups for dope and other things. Also mention of the talkgroup being "secure" when it obviously isn't. Some rather colorful language being used.

Unit IDs in the 46101xx range.
 

losttapes219

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Messages
56
Reaction score
2
I doubt it's LaPorte County Metro detectives, as they are going encrypted except for dispatch. It could be a drug task force from Indiana State Police or a federal law enforcement agency like the FBI or DEA.
 

W3AXL

RF Engineer
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 2, 2015
Messages
91
Reaction score
68
Location
Indiana
I'd be inclined to agree except for the fact the the unit IDs are for Laporte county. I'd expect state or federal agents to have non-county IDs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top