• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

How do you test SWR on handhelds?

DaveC1964

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
49
Location
Schaumburg, Il
So I have this Midland handheld that came with the standard rubber ducky. I replaced it with a 51" base loaded antenna. How do I tune that to get best SWR? I think usually those meters go in between the radio and antenna right? I am not sure how I would do that with a handheld, maybe I need some kind of an adapter? Is there a recommended way of doing it?
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
23,889
Location
Roaming the Intermountain West
Unless you can get the SWR meter in-line with the radio and the antenna, you really can't. Does the CB have an antenna connector on top, or does the antenna mount permanently to the radio?

There's a lot going on, too. On a hand held radio, the SWR is going to be impacted by the user holding the radio (radio chassis coupling into the users hand acting as a counterpoise. Unless you can match all that in, it's kind of pointless. Attaching an SWR meter in the middle of that is going to result in some differences.
The CB walkie talkies themselves won't be hurt by high SWR, they are designed to take it.

Tuning a telescopic antenna would require adjusting how much antenna was pulled out, and getting that right every time might be difficult.
 

paulears

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2015
Messages
790
Location
Lowestoft - UK
Not much point really, because no handheld has a good VSWR, because every radio is too small to act as a groundplane, and the wet bag of water holding it vary in shape, size, mass, electrical conductivity.

in all real world practical tests, the only measurable test is simply that of field strength, as in how string is the signal.

what you can do is get a sheet of metal, drill a small hole in the middle and screw in an antenna to a cable with different adaptors underneath. Then you can with the right gear check where the antenna is resonant, and measure the VSWR. Year back I did some tests using this method and field strength and came to the conclusion that most antennas were dreadful. Crazy claim as for gain, and for those that extended proof they were just an impractical antenna. VSWR readings from that test can’t be duplicated on the radio, because any adaptor, even a small one, wrecks the measurement.

the thing that jumped out was that quarter waves for VHF that work as a ¾ wave at UHf very well. All the clever ones with filtering with coils and capacitors perform ok at. Maybe two frequencies, but are awful at others.
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
9,047
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
I have used an empty radio chassi of about the same size as the radio and put the antenna on that and then a coax on the inside goes to the analyser/SWR meter and to the actual radio. I hold the chassi the same way as a radio and measure.

/Ubbe
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,368
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I have used an empty radio chassi of about the same size as the radio and put the antenna on that and then a coax on the inside goes to the analyser/SWR meter and to the actual radio. I hold the chassi the same way as a radio and measure.

/Ubbe
This is how you do it but also decouple the coax coming out of the empty chassis to reduce the influence of the coax in the measurement.
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
9,047
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
The chassi works to some degree as a sleeve balun. I see no changes in SWR or in the antenna analyzers diagram when I touch and move the coax cable, but extra toroids wont hurt.

/Ubbe
 

DaveC1964

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
49
Location
Schaumburg, Il
Unless you can get the SWR meter in-line with the radio and the antenna, you really can't. Does the CB have an antenna connector on top, or does the antenna mount permanently to the radio?

There's a lot going on, too. On a hand held radio, the SWR is going to be impacted by the user holding the radio (radio chassis coupling into the users hand acting as a counterpoise. Unless you can match all that in, it's kind of pointless. Attaching an SWR meter in the middle of that is going to result in some differences.
The CB walkie talkies themselves won't be hurt by high SWR, they are designed to take it.

Tuning a telescopic antenna would require adjusting how much antenna was pulled out, and getting that right every time might be difficult.
It has BNC connector. It is a Midland 75-822 and I have one of those Amazon base loaded telescoping antennas. I wanted to see how the SWR for that compared to the standard rubber ducky antenna which I don't want to use due to those having terrible range. I am skeptical of those aftermarket antennas being tuned right.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
23,889
Location
Roaming the Intermountain West
It has BNC connector. It is a Midland 75-822 and I have one of those Amazon base loaded telescoping antennas. I wanted to see how the SWR for that compared to the standard rubber ducky antenna which I don't want to use due to those having terrible range. I am skeptical of those aftermarket antennas being tuned right.

Good advice above on how to do it.

I made a similar device as Ubbe did with an old Kenwood TK-290 that I gutted out. I've used it for years to test questionable hand held radio antennas at work.

Testing with the BNC connector should be easy enough.

Don't chase perfection, though. You probably won't find it. In fact, with the lack of a good ground plane, you may find that most of your antennas are not going to give very good SWR.
 

W8HDU

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Messages
352
Location
Lima, Ohio
The Nano VNA is one such method. Or using RG-58 (stranded) cables to your wattmeter. I was able to do this easily while testing the President Randy II and QYT CB-58, When you test, make sure it's outdoors with the transmit antenna in the clear. If you try doing it on the bench in your shack, you'll get all sorts of artifacts.

I use the same setup for VHF/UHF measurements.

Also, prior to measurement of the antenna, use a RF load to get a baseline for the output.
 

paulears

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2015
Messages
790
Location
Lowestoft - UK
If moving about, or changing hand or radio position doesn't change the results on an analyser, then I suggest it's broken!

Sticking ANY antenna into my analyser and looking at the screen produces the expected dips and spikes, but just rotating/moving in the office clearly shows the interaction.

The upshot of course is that on a portable, VSWR is largely irrelevant. Tuning for antenna match is pointless as most handhelds expect VSWR to be wrong, and just protect themselves where necessary. If you want to tune an antenna (like the telescopic ones) on a portable - then tune by signal strength. Look at the meter/analyser at a distance and adjust till you get the most output. That's where the handheld and antenna combination is working most efficiently. If that has a high or low VSWR on a meter, the meter setup and connection is probably flawed. X Watts in, and X power at a remote antenna is the sensible thing to use to adjust them. With handhelds and bodies offering such dismal balance to the antenna, circulating currents just confuse the measurements.
 
Top