I can't believe it.

Status
Not open for further replies.

lanbergld

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
200
Location
Richmond VA
Tonight on 44.08 MHz I got a you-know-what. I was shocked. I haven't picked up this type of transmission since the 1980's. It was the last thing I expected to hear. For certain reasons I also don't think it came from my neighborhood.


Larry
 

kma371

QRT
Joined
Feb 20, 2001
Messages
6,204
Tonight on 44.08 MHz I got a you-know-what. I was shocked. I haven't picked up this type of transmission since the 1980's. It was the last thing I expected to hear. For certain reasons I also don't think it came from my neighborhood.


Larry

No. We don't know what. What was it?
 

KB7MIB

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
4,254
Location
Peoria, AZ.
Wirelessly posted (Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/6.0.3/27.2338; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 320X240 LG VN530)

Cordless phone bases ran from 43.720-44.480 (channels 1-15) and 46.610-46.970 (channels 16-25). The handsets ran from 48.760-49.990. All ranges were shared with and/or interspersed between other radio services, including Motor Carrier (buses and trucks), Forest Products, Petroleum Production, and the military. Plus the 5-channels used by 47 CFR Part 15 49MHz walkie-talkies. (Per Police Call's Consolidated Frequency List, circa 1998.)
44.080 is not a valid cordless phone frequency. 43.960 was channel 6 and 44.120 was channel 7. 44.080 was a Motor Carrier - Trucks allocation.
 
Last edited:

awattam

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
268
Location
Nashua NH
One of our neighbours still has one running at around 903mhz. At least I am told that as I have never tuned in and listened..
 

wbswetnam

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
1,811
Location
DMR-istan
Remembering the mid 1980s

Yes, I remember back in the mid 1980s when many cordless phones used 46 Mhz range, and the popular Bearcat 800XLT could pick up cellular telephone calls because they were still analog and the frequency band wasn't blocked on scanners at the time. Of course, I never listened in on any of those things.
 

WB4CS

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
900
Location
Northern Alabama
Yes, I remember back in the mid 1980s when many cordless phones used 46 Mhz range, and the popular Bearcat 800XLT could pick up cellular telephone calls because they were still analog and the frequency band wasn't blocked on scanners at the time. Of course, I never listened in on any of those things.

Since the OP hasn't chimed back in except to post something that he later edited to say "delete" I'm not sure if we're getting off topic or not :confused:

Ahh the good old 46 MHz cordless phones... You could learn a lot about your neighbors with a scanner back in those days.
 

KB7MIB

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
4,254
Location
Peoria, AZ.
Wirelessly posted (Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/6.0.3/27.2338; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 320X240 LG VN530)

I can recall picking up cordless phones between the AM BCB and 160m many, many years ago.
Once in a great while I'll search the 33cm Ham band looking for FM repeaters (there's maybe a handful around the Phoenix metro area, but either they aren't all that active, or they aren't in range) and run across a cordless phone. There used to be a baby monitor there as well, that seemed to be in the same exact location as a 49MHz one. The audio was identical. (I have a pair of 5-channel 49 MHz walkie-talkies from RS, and I check the band for activity once in awhile.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top