Ideas for MilAir Scanner

Status
Not open for further replies.

twolf816

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
444
Reaction score
0
Location
Bastrop, LA
I would like to buy a scanner that is milair capable. Im not asking "what is the best.." because its just an opinion. Ive never listened or attempted to listen to military aircraft, therefore i dont have a clue which is popular. Could those who listen to military aircraft perhaps list their scanner and maybe a sentece or 2 about its performance on the milair band, Thanks in advance.
 

safetyobc

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2004
Messages
3,354
Reaction score
34
Location
South Arkansas
i have a BC250D. Although I don't live near a mil air base, I do occasionaly pick up Air force. Sound quality is excellent, but I'm no expert. Most transmissions I have heard have come through loud and clear. The BC785D is a mobile/base unit and is the same radio as the BC250D which is a handheld. Whatever you perfer more.
 

hulka

Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2004
Messages
441
Reaction score
37
Location
Laveen, Az
I have a Radio Shack Pro-96. It will pick up Mil-Air when you enable it in the software. I receive it well. I have read that the Radio Shack Pro-2052 is a great Mil-Air scanner. Catalog #: 20-432

If you do a search for Mil-Air you should come up with a bunch of results.

Kevin
 

n4voxgill

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 15, 2000
Messages
2,588
Reaction score
2
Location
New Braunfels, TX
I have a Pro2005, a Pro2006, a BC895 and a BC780 dedicated to listening to milair. I am about 10 miles from Randolph AFB and use a 2 meter ham, VHF, antenna hooked to a stridesburg multicoupler feeding the 4 scanners. They all pick up about the same. I can hear the tower at Randolph, but not the tower at sequin strip that is about 20 miles away. You can hear the planes from way out.

I also have an AOR, AR8200 MK3 handheld unit that does an excellent job, but with it's antenna can't pick up the tower from my house, but all of the planes. I have a Pro96 and now a Pro2096 that WIN96 opens up the milair band, and they work very well. I have not hooked the 2096 up to the outside antenna yet, but sitting here on my desk with its stock antenna I am picking up planes many miles out. I also use a Pro95, but it is not very good on milair. Planes have to be within a few miles to hear them.

There are more milair frequencies than any other group you would scan. If you want to scan for new frequencies it is a real challenge. You have to listen to 175 MHz of spectrum and even if you break it down to 10 MHz blocks you will miss short transmissions. It took me several weeks with four scanners searching 10 MHz blocks to come up with most of the frequencies in use near me.

I use ham radios to pick up the longrange HF frequencies used by the airforce, to most used is 11.175 MHz in USB. All coast guard planes use 8696 or 5696 KHz and that gets pretty interesting.

There is a lot to listen to out there.
 

loumaag

Silent Key - Aug 2014
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
12,935
Reaction score
11
Location
Katy, TX
n4voxgill said:
... 175 MHz of spectrum and even if you break it down to 10 MHz blocks you will miss short transmissions. It took me several weeks with four scanners searching 10 MHz blocks to come up with most of the frequencies in use near me.
Gill, this is probably advice too late but IDTracker can log the activity and record the audio based on frequency also. Need to use it with the Unidens only though. :)
 

CORN

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2003
Messages
1,196
Reaction score
351
Location
Nashville, TN
Radio Shack Pro-2052, Uniden BC-780XLT, Pro-43, and BC-296D have all done well for me in that band. Out of all of them, in my personal opinion from experience, the BC-780XLT has been the milair scanner to come thru the best. On my PRO-2052 every now and then it has a lot of static in it. Some days it doesn't. But i've never had a static problem with the 780 even from aircraft many miles away.
 

rbellows

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
103
Reaction score
26
Location
Midlands, SC
also...

I, also am engaged in this most frustrating of areas of this hobby. (My opinion only...) After a couple of weeks of research, I decided on the RS PRO-2052. So far Im impressed with the overall performance of the unit (I also have the PRO-95 enabled with Win95), but I still have YET to pick up a mil transmission. I think I have antennae issues. I live within 40 km of two air bases, and one BCT base(with helo traffic). I passed on the BC250d, mostly because of cost, but it was my 2nd choice. Good Luck!
 

loumaag

Silent Key - Aug 2014
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
12,935
Reaction score
11
Location
Katy, TX
Re: also...

rbellows said:
...(I also have the PRO-95 enabled with Win95), but I still have YET to pick up a mil transmission. I think I have antennae issues. I live within 40 km of two air bases, and one BCT base(with helo traffic). ...
I don't think you have antenna issues. As I have stated elsewhere, the Pro-95 was designed not to be effective in the MilAir band. Understand the subtile difference between that statement and the statement that a radio was not designed for MilAir. The latter means it will work, but not well, the former means it really won't work there.
 

rbellows

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
103
Reaction score
26
Location
Midlands, SC
Yes, I believe that is quite correct re: the pro-95. But I have yet to pick up anything with the 2052 either. (I should and probably will continue this in RS forum) Thanks!
 

rbellows

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
103
Reaction score
26
Location
Midlands, SC
Yes, I believe that is quite correct re: the pro-95. But I have yet to pick up anything with the 2052 either. (I should and probably will continue this in RS forum) Thanks!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top