What I don't understand is why does someone need hundreds of watts to just get on the air and say "audio" or "worldwide?'" This could be accomplished with the legal 5 watts.
I often defend some of the CBers that post, but now I'm starting to see why the ham community and others look down on the CB crowd. I don't really see anything wrong with properly tuning a cb radio to perform at 100% modualtion and legal limit. Many radios, especially in the days when I got started in the 90's, were set way below 5 watts and full modualtion supposedly to make sure they wouldn't leave the factory exceeding FCC limits. With a properly installed antenna and a nice power mic, these radios performed well, even better in a base situation.
I was young too then, and had the "mods" done for extra channels, the big swing mods, etc. I had a linear for a bit and found it messed up the drive throughs at Burger King and McDonalds, set off car alarms, etc. It didn't help my signal as much as I thought it would.
As I got older and smarter, I realized a lot of this stuff was dumb, and the CB band actually deteriorated to the point where only morons were on that wouldn't answer you anyway. What's the point of the radio if all you're going to do is say stupid things and not answer anyone?
As far as those who don't understand why it's wrong, eventually you will grow up too and understand.
And the FCC- I think they actually encourage it now that they have type-accepted radios like the DX 959. It comes with variable power, talkback, roger beep, frequency counter. Why do you need variable power unless you're running a linear? Why do you need a freq. counter unless you're expanding the frequencies?
SO before we say shame on the guy modifying his radio, we should also ask why the FCC is allowing these radios.
AND- with reviews of CB radios like this on the web, why doesn't the FCC do something about these guys?
Galaxy DX 959 Review