Whether one likes or dislikes George Soros, facts matter. In this case, he has dual citizenship with the US, so the "foreign ownership" rule does not apply.
Good point. It bears repeating that both parties supported the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which allowed these giant conglomerates to control more than 90% of the media/entertainment industries.Whether one likes or dislikes George Soros, facts matter. In this case, he has dual citizenship with the US, so the "foreign ownership" rule does not apply.
Sinclair doesn't own a single radio station. They sold off their radio stations many years ago. They only own TV now.You forgot the Sinclair Broadcasting Group they own most of the Right wing radio stations ........
Add Whistler to that tooI'd like to see the requirement that Uniden scanners have to skip over encrypted transmissions eliminated.
You can just turn that setting off in the menu. Mine makes a phone sound instead.Add Whistler to that too
Move administration of the amateur service to a third party. So much of it is already, like the testing, repeater coordination, etc All things the FCC used to do. What are they doing for us in reality? I bet not one single ham rule gets changed. They asked this same sort of thing in 2017, and other services did see regulation changes then.Eliminate Amateur Service license fees. (Except for people who use out of area call numbers 🤣)
I understand that. As I stated we were though this before with no actions taken for ham radio:A lot of rules for other services have no application to ham radio. This order is about technical regs, so things like data rates are being examined, which is an amateur radio concern.
Again I ask, what has the FCC done recently for ham radio.?
Again I ask, what has the FCC done recently for ham radio.?
That single rule change took decades, and they had to get a congress person to pressure the FCC. Further back than this 2013 piece: https://www.arrl.org/files/file/QST/This Month in QST/September 2013/ItSeemsToUs.pdf Also read up on RM-11306 ARRL, The National Association for Amateur Radio PETITION FOR RULEMAKING regarding RM-11306 : Christopher D. Imlay : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive![]()
FCC Amends Amateur Radio Rules for Greater Flexibility
The Commission adopts this R&O and FNPRM to eliminate the baud rate limitation and establish a bandwidth limitation in certain amateur bands. The item also proposes removal of the baud rate limitation in several additional bands.www.fcc.gov
My biggest gripe about the Vanity calls is they should've never applied to the region. So if you wanted "W1ZZZ" in New England, but it was taken, you shouldn't have been able to get "W4ZZZ". You're applying in region n, that will be your number in the call, vanity or not.Vanity call signs.
Hams don't even have primary use of 900MHz, being secondary to ISM users.The company wanting to take a portion of the 900 MHz band will affect more than just licensed amateur radio as it will take the portion of the 90 MHz band that is also used by all of the LORA/Meshtastic devices.
Which is true for most, if not all amateur bands.Hams don't even have primary use of 900MHz, being secondary to ISM users.
All except 2m off the top of my headWhich is true for most, if not all amateur bands.
And this mere fact is what protects the bands so that we can continue to use them (assuming we don't interfere with the primary users)Which is true for most, if not all amateur bands.
Yes this was one of the rules changed for Part 95 as part of the 2017 rules inquiry. How the heck did CB get a rule changed and we did not?2) CB was recently authorized for FM and since the FCC is content with allowing people to use 50 watt GMRS Radio on FM frequency without any real license ( yes there is a fee, but no test of knowledge so it's just a money grab ) why not allow CB to go above 4 watts on AM / FM and and also lift the 12 watt ceiling on SSB?