How much does Intermediate Frequency Exchange (IFX) help?
I have seen some posts here stating that it doesn't work?
It depends of if you have any receive issues and what type of issue. Generally speaking when you receive a 100MHz signal it is mixed down to a lower frequency, lets say 10MHz, that are more easy to handle in the receiver. The oscillator signal in a receiver, lets say 90MHz, are added to the receive signal and creates a third frequency, the IF, that then are 100-90=10MHz and the receiver can then use a better quality filter at 10MHz.
But that 90MHz oscillator will also produce an equal strong signal from an 80MHz input signal, 90-80=10, and if there are a transmitter there it will be received as good as the one at 100MHz.
The IFX function can then switch the oscillator to be 110MHz and 110-100=10 so that the 100MHz signal are still received just as good but the 80MHz one will be mixed to produce 110-80=30MHz which the 10MHz filter will not let thru.
Most Uniden scanners, at least the most expensive ones, use two different IF frequencies, lets say 10MHz and 15MHz, using two different filters that increase production cost but the IFX function can then also make a switch between the 10MHz and 15MHz filters to change the relation of what unwanted frequencies that will be received.
When it comes to Unidens SDS scanners they use a chip that are its whole receiver that can be bought for 70 cent from Alibaba, if you buy only one. This chip has a lot of internal interference signals that appear as the unwanted receive signals but are several hundreds more and creates a higher risk that any of those hundreds of signals will mix with signals at the receive input and interfere with your reception. So IFX will have a higher use in SDS scanners.
/Ubbe