Recently I fired up my old pro 2004. My plan was to use it to scan for control channel activity using a scanner that I knew did not support any digital modes. I figured I would test my theory first on detecting a digitally modulated carrier by doing a quick search between 870-890mhz. Before everyone complains about doing that remember a $20 SDR will cover that range with no issues. The scanner had no problems picking up the digitally modulated carriers. This made me wonder since the cellular signals are all digital today and theoretically encrypted why is the cellular coverage ban still in effect?
As I mentioned any SDR can cover those ranges. Scanners manufactured for other regions cover the ranges. The signals are technically secure. This last being a topic that I am not going to discuss here. The ban was originally forced on the scanning community by industry not wanting/ being able to secure the networks. The government placed the ban in a typical knee jerk reaction. Big industry with lots of $$$$ to throw around wagging the dog. So here we are today with a now obsolete reason still being enforced. I think its time to restore the full frequency coverage to hardware. This is not that hard for the manufacturers to do. A firmware upgrade would do it.
Lets avoid the "the law is the law" argument and get down to should the ban be lifted and why/why not?
As I mentioned any SDR can cover those ranges. Scanners manufactured for other regions cover the ranges. The signals are technically secure. This last being a topic that I am not going to discuss here. The ban was originally forced on the scanning community by industry not wanting/ being able to secure the networks. The government placed the ban in a typical knee jerk reaction. Big industry with lots of $$$$ to throw around wagging the dog. So here we are today with a now obsolete reason still being enforced. I think its time to restore the full frequency coverage to hardware. This is not that hard for the manufacturers to do. A firmware upgrade would do it.
Lets avoid the "the law is the law" argument and get down to should the ban be lifted and why/why not?