RFI-EMI-GUY
Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2013
- Messages
- 6,954
Remember that the 536 use a "floating" output so you have to set the oscilloscopes probe ground to the scanners chassi and then measure on "tip" and then on "sleeve" of the connector. If you ground the oscilloscope to the "ground" of the speaker you will get false readings if you don't use a transformer ground loop isolator.
But the important thing are what you hear, so an exact measurement isn't neccesary.
Most scanners have noise on both earphone and loudspeaker outputs as they don't put enough attention to the audio amp design. There's several things that could be made to improve a scanner. Tone control, loudness, good audio electronics, speaker, RF front end filters, quality buttons and dials. If the audio sounds distorted, bassy, thinny or rattles at moderate volume levels it doesn't matter how sensitive a scanner are if your listening are compomised by a poorly designed audio solution.
/Ubbe
The 536 uses a BTL, Bridge Tied Load amplifier similar to this schematic:
http://www.learningelectronics.net/circuits/images/1-watt_btl_audio_amplifier_circuit_diagram-2.png
The manual doesn't emphasize enough the importance that whatever you connect to the speaker jack cannot return to ground (or A+). This means only a speaker coil or transformer coil can connect directly to the speaker jack. You cannot drive an unbalanced amplifier or sound card directly. You need DC transformer isolation. If you damage the amplifier, you could get distortion, noise or low output.
Now on to a true story. In the 80's I was involved with the Motorola Smartnet system in City of Miami. There were complaints from the users about distorted audio from the STX radios (They used MX300's previously). The COM was self maintained and the technicians were given a Motorola engineering log book page (By a product group engineer) containing a simple fix for crossover distortion adding a diode and resistor to the simple two transistor BTL amp driving the radio speaker. It worked splendidly. I was not involved directly with this fix.
Fast forward two years and the City's Project Manager "Eddie" takes a new job at Miami Beach and oversees the implementation of that new system. Eddie is considered a "Champion" of Motorola having secured this second no-bid contract. He is also a smart no-nonsense kind of guy.
I am now in the position of being the account executive for this project taking on the new installation and its many problems (I received no sales commission, that fellow conveniently retired taking with him the commission!). So on the day I am to obtain the final payout milestone for the system, Eddie informs me that he is withholding $750K because of the squeaky speaker audio. Eddie hands me the Motorola Logbook page and says, "these radios sound crap compared to my old system (City of Miami), they sound like a 50 Cent speaker". Eddie was right on both counts, Motorola did not fix the crossover distortion on the new version radios and actually installed a different very tinny speaker (actual cost about 50 cents). That tinny speaker was to make the radio SPL appear higher to meet a requirement of an automotive factory.
I had an uphill battle getting the plant to authorize the rework and even falsely accused of disclosing confidential information (the log book page) when the client had been given that info previously. In the end all the radios were reworked by Motorola, and I collected the $750K receivable.
Last edited: