LADD - Alberta or Nationwide?

Status
Not open for further replies.

exkalibur

Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Messages
2,803
Location
York, Ontario
So we should list illegal activities so they can interfere with more licensed users. If I squatted in your house, does that mean I own it?

We list FRS, GMRS and CB frequencies here - does that mean we're promoting illegal use? Afterall, if you're using a proper FRS/GMRS/CB radio, you don't need to know the frequencies at all.

Listing a frequency being used isn't promoting illegal activity. SMH.
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
We list FRS, GMRS and CB frequencies here - does that mean we're promoting illegal use? Afterall, if you're using a proper FRS/GMRS/CB radio, you don't need to know the frequencies at all.

Listing a frequency being used isn't promoting illegal activity. SMH.


Was up in northern Alberta last week and it was'nt the abuse of LADD GMRS of FRS
That grabbed my attention it was use of Marine Radio and frequencies

Easy to use and obtain and now easy to abuse, I wonder why a gas station was selling them
Now I know
 

NDRADIONUT

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
1,952
Location
FARGO ND
I have heard lots of truckers on marine radios from both countries along with others using them for businesses...
 

robertmac

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
2,293
As I have stated, the CBizing of VHF by truckers using illegal radios being modded and not following what their license states, if they have one. Anarchy on the VHF bands after leaving the CB band.
 

thundermedic

Database Administrator
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
560
Location
Calgary, Alberta
here is a question to ponder...

Industry Canada has mandated in BC a limited set of Narrowband frequencies to be used on resource roads. Just because anyone in BC has these frequencies loaded in, and Industry Canada has said they are to be used in BC ONLY. (And the LD are NOT LADD channels)

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON RESOURCE INDUSTRY RADIO CHANNELS USED IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

Should they be listed everywhere because of the potential?

The RRDB is to be a list of confirmed frequencies (not licensed) in each area with no overlap. What is the best way of doing that? (Positive suggestions preferred)
 

NDRADIONUT

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
1,952
Location
FARGO ND
I have never heard any of those 35 ? Rr freqs used down here in nd like the 5 lads and 45 or so others.... The alberta wide freqs have all been monitored here in nd so obviously they are used in manitoba....
 

NDRADIONUT

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
1,952
Location
FARGO ND
Should they be listed everywhere because of the potential? NO IT DOESNT SEEM TO BE HAPPENING WITH THAT SET....

The RRDB is to be a list of confirmed frequencies (not licensed) in each area with no overlap.
THE 5 LADS SHOULD BE LISTED AS NATIONWIDE AND MAYBE THE ALBERTA WIDE FREQS TOO...
 

robertmac

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
2,293
Now we have to resort to yelling. But didn't the LADD frequencies start off the same as these RR frequencies? I would say they should remain as BC resource and not anywhere else except in the areas in BC that they will be used in. We shouldn't encourage the use of frequencies for which one is not licensed. Or for which others are licensed and have people encroach on who are not licensed.
 

NDRADIONUT

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
1,952
Location
FARGO ND
No one is yelling.... Its not encouraging anything... It is already going on and prob. Cant get much worse....
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
6,663
Location
Sector 001
I have never heard any of those 35 ? Rr freqs.


The 35 RR&LD frequencies are ONLY used in BC by the forest service/resource roads. They are only authorized in BC as mobile to mobile, and I beleive Ministry of Forest & Range hold licenses for them. All other users must have the 'RR' appendix added to their existing license to be able to legally use them. They are all 30w 2.5KHz deviation except for the 5 LD channels, those are 5w(I think) 2.5KHz deviation.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
6,663
Location
Sector 001
Ive heard 153.050 referred to as lad 5 many times ??


That is one of the Alberta open channels, not LAD 5. The LAD(Logging ADministration) channels are a BC thing from many years ago. They eventually turned into a trucker thing, as an alternative to the VERY short range that CB has in the mountains of BC.

If you look at the second photo I uploaded to this thread you will see that 153.050 is not a valid mobile to mobile channel in BC, as the other 5 Alberta Open channels are not valid in BC either.

It was only around 2003?(can't exactly remember when) that IC allowed LAD 1 to be used as a resource road channel in Alberta, and only north of Edmnton(52degrees latitude and north) LAD 1 is not valid south of Edmonton as a mobile to mobile channel, LAD 2 and LAD 3 are not valid mobile to mobile channels anywhere in Alberta. LAD 4 however, is a valid mobile to mobile channel in Alberta, when used as a resource road channel.

The label of LAD 5 as 153.050 is unofficial, while it may be called LAD 5 by those that do not know any better, is not correct. It is actually part of the 6 Alberta Open channels.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

NDRADIONUT

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
1,952
Location
FARGO ND
There again what is being done with those 9 freqs is a lot different than what the govt planned (50 watt radios all over etc).... But what belongs in the db is reality not wishful thinking....
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
6,663
Location
Sector 001

Seen that before... Hopefully they are pointing buyers towards IC licensing.





Kinda like RR actually... Lots of words but little substance or intelligence.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
6,663
Location
Sector 001
There again what is being done with those 9 freqs is a lot different than what the govt planned (50 watt radios all over etc).... But what belongs in the db is reality not wishful thinking....


10 frequencies, but yes, I agree with you, they are being used in no way near how they were invisioned by IC in the first place.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top