LAFD receives new Helo

Status
Not open for further replies.

MtnBiker2005

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
3,566
Location
San Diego County, California

DPD1

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
1,994
Still not sure these were a logical choice... But it's nice.
 

E5911

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
559
Location
the lower desert
Anyone know when LASO is placing the 3 super Pumas in service? Will they stay black or be painted green and gold?
 

Code20Photog

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
269
Location
North of Rock, South of Hard Place.
If you think it appropriate (your choice) can you say why the pilots dislike the A-W helo?

No power. During firefighting ops with the belly tank full, they can only fly with one pilot on board.

3878984199_9a7e7e4cd6_o.jpg
 

LAflyer

Global DB Admin
Moderator
Joined
Mar 4, 2009
Messages
1,827
Location
SoCal
Is that not because the LAFD opted twice to retrofit larger water tanks on the birds?

They were delivered with conformal 350 gallon tanks (same as Bell 412s), but as I recall the LAFD then opted to get 420 gallon tanks. That’s almost 600lbs in added weight if utilized.
And most recently in December 2011, they received added funding to yet again change out the water tanks, now to a 470 gallon version. All said and done they crammed another 1,000lbs of payload on the aircraft above original plans.

For the record the AW139 has almost twice the power of the Bell 412s. The Pratt Whitey engines produce 1679hp versus the 900 on the Bell 412s.

btw - cool pic !
 
Last edited:

DPD1

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
1,994
They're bigger overall. About 1000 pounds heavier I think. That probably makes it feel a little more sluggish than the 412. But surprisingly, it does apparently carry more water. It doesn't look like it could, but it does. I haven't seen the latest tanks. I assume they must extend out the sides a bit or something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top