I guess the county did not want to loose their grant money so they spend what they were about to loose on the cheapest p25 series radios. It would not matter who builds out the sysytem infrastructure for LacCo, as long as its standard p25, the radios will work.
The only problem I see is that Moto, if selected for the build out, may give warrenty issues to the county for not having 100% Moto radios. But that just comes down to a contract negotiations issue.
LOL.. Tait is far from the cheapest. Quality wise it is on par with Motorola. Those that are not aware of that are not informed. Ask just about any Tait user. Have you seen one yet? Held a portable in your hand? Used it? Looked at the speaker microphone connection?
You want cheaper than look at Vertex, Relm, Icom, Kenwood, and others.
Dealer cost on a highband trunked portable from Icom is 1k. THAT is inexpensive. Tait is nowhere near that cheap.
And warranty? There is no way a subscriber unit is in any way going to affect the warranty of the infrastructure. Even Motorola would not try to claim that.
If it affects the operation of the system, then the system would not be a fully complaint P25 system.
Do you really want any system that will only allow one manufacturers radios to be used on it? That leaves no room for true interoperability, as well as competitive bids. The cost would be outrageous.
It is amazing how much P25 radios have gone down in cost here in MO where the new statewide system is open to any P25 CAP compliant radio. Radios are available from 1250 up - again full blown P25 trunking radios!
Notice very clearly - I am not claiming Tait is better than, worse than, etc Motorola. Lets not get that battle started. I am just stating that by no means it is the cheapest by any stretch.