tac7
Member
I heard a while ago that the new system for Hamilton was going live on the 22nd of June/12. It's still hard to believe when it actually happens though.
I have been listening since I was a kid, at a time where you had to de-tune an FM radio to be able to receive the police channel just around 87 MHz.
When I moved to Hamilton in the late 60's, Hamilton Police and Fire used the 150 MHz band, with separate channels for Dundas and other small towns around Hamilton. Then they all moved to 142 MHz with the Hamilton / Wentworth amalgamation. OPP was still on 42.060 and 42.220 analog, but they then moved to 142 MHz digital in the clear. Then came 800 MHz analog trunking, until now.
While the move to digital was inevitable, encryption could have been reserved for sensitive situations, or where there was a real concern for the risk of officers. They have been using terminals or cell phones for private info all along and managed well, so why go totally encrypted now?
In fact, when the profile of a dangerous offender is broadcast in the clear, it improves the safety of those that listen, since if spotted, they can avoid a dangerous encounter with the offender, and at the same time they can contact the police to help them capture the suspect.
Secrecy doesn't inspire trust. A system could be implemented for the public and media that either delays the transmissions for a specific time period, or where non-sensitive transmissions remain in the clear.
I have been listening since I was a kid, at a time where you had to de-tune an FM radio to be able to receive the police channel just around 87 MHz.
When I moved to Hamilton in the late 60's, Hamilton Police and Fire used the 150 MHz band, with separate channels for Dundas and other small towns around Hamilton. Then they all moved to 142 MHz with the Hamilton / Wentworth amalgamation. OPP was still on 42.060 and 42.220 analog, but they then moved to 142 MHz digital in the clear. Then came 800 MHz analog trunking, until now.
While the move to digital was inevitable, encryption could have been reserved for sensitive situations, or where there was a real concern for the risk of officers. They have been using terminals or cell phones for private info all along and managed well, so why go totally encrypted now?
In fact, when the profile of a dangerous offender is broadcast in the clear, it improves the safety of those that listen, since if spotted, they can avoid a dangerous encounter with the offender, and at the same time they can contact the police to help them capture the suspect.
Secrecy doesn't inspire trust. A system could be implemented for the public and media that either delays the transmissions for a specific time period, or where non-sensitive transmissions remain in the clear.
Last edited: