RadioFlyer2012
Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2011
- Messages
- 35
I understand the gps tracking, it is a very smart concept, but I am looking to get a live gps tracker now for my car. I saw a few demos, and I am trying to understand which satellites the live imagery actually comes from.
I say to myself, why pay 800 dollars for a tracker, and then pay 400 a year just to track it lol. Estimating the number of people using trackers already obviously outweighs the number of satellites currently in orbit. This means that there is already a high level wide zoom available over the continent, and its just the software that interprets and limits the imagery access perimeter.
Say I wanted to just type in my own gps cordinates to view a live tornado, and then type in another cordinate halfway around the world at a 100 ft high tidal wave in the middle of the pacific, etc.
I mean perhaps I am confused, but I dont believe we need to task satellites anymore due to the complex lens nanotech developed in the past 50 years right?
Although I would imagine that access to this program that allows the ability to increase the diameter of coverage would co inside on a cost basis to the suckers that they have already scraped funds from. Which means each license would be only million of dollars on a good day.
If my thought basis is off, please feel free to correct me, thanks for any info available.
Here is an example of a live tracker.
GPS Tracking | Vehicle Tracking | LiveViewGPS Tracking Systems 1-888-544-0494
I say to myself, why pay 800 dollars for a tracker, and then pay 400 a year just to track it lol. Estimating the number of people using trackers already obviously outweighs the number of satellites currently in orbit. This means that there is already a high level wide zoom available over the continent, and its just the software that interprets and limits the imagery access perimeter.
Say I wanted to just type in my own gps cordinates to view a live tornado, and then type in another cordinate halfway around the world at a 100 ft high tidal wave in the middle of the pacific, etc.
I mean perhaps I am confused, but I dont believe we need to task satellites anymore due to the complex lens nanotech developed in the past 50 years right?
Although I would imagine that access to this program that allows the ability to increase the diameter of coverage would co inside on a cost basis to the suckers that they have already scraped funds from. Which means each license would be only million of dollars on a good day.
If my thought basis is off, please feel free to correct me, thanks for any info available.
Here is an example of a live tracker.
GPS Tracking | Vehicle Tracking | LiveViewGPS Tracking Systems 1-888-544-0494