10's of millions of dollars for the 99% of calls that don't need to be off-network is the reason for the expense. That makes sense. The 1% risk of system-dependent communications for fireground operations is the reason to have the option to move off network. However, that's not the majority of communications.
I'm actually not biased, believe it or not. I'm going based on facts. The radio business for me is service, not sales. Doesn't matter if it's high-end TDMA digital trunking or low-end conventional analog simplex. As for my involvement on the Board, we didn't make the decision to go TDMA, or even trunking for that matter. That decision was made for us by the County before we were even told it was coming. That's just politics. If anything, I "should" be biased AGAINST it, but I am not. The entire system makes sense. But I appreciate the attempt to discredit me.
More cities are going to P25, and Phase 2. In fact, another few counties in NY are on their way to Phase 2, beyond Livingston. TDMA isn't evil. It's been around a lot longer than public safety has had access to it.
The key to technology is to understand its capabilities and limitations. Then apply both of those to various risk factors and scenarios to come up with the best solution. Simple as that.
Opinions vary, but you'll continue to see agencies move to P25 and TDMA, like it or not. Once this LTE stuff is sorted out, you will likely see another wave of technology get pushed out. Embrace it, understand it... or get left behind in a huff with your arms crossed, just like you are doing now.
Do it for the children...
That's all I got...
Merry Xmas