Are there any thoughts of inventing an OpenSky police scanner? If so, when will it be coming out?
DaveNF2G said:Actually, it's not as impossible as we had been led to believe previously.
As per a note on my home page, New York's contract with M/A-Comm requires the company to allow other manufacturers to purchase licensing to make Open Sky radios. There's no reason Uniden and/or GRE could not get legal authority to start designing and building scanners now.
DaveNF2G said:Actually, it's not as impossible as we had been led to believe previously.
As per a note on my home page, New York's contract with M/A-Comm requires the company to allow other manufacturers to purchase licensing to make Open Sky radios. There's no reason Uniden and/or GRE could not get legal authority to start designing and building scanners now.
n4voxgill said:there must not be any difference between a scanner and a radio that is designed to transmit as licensed by macom
When the radios are operating on a wireless carrier's AMPS/CDPD network, then yes I think someone hoping to listen in is going to be very disappointed.N_Jay said:I would predict that most scanner listeners would not be happy with the performance they would get from a scanner in a "cellular" architecture system.
DaveNF2G said:Actually, it's not as impossible as we had been led to believe previously.
As per a note on my home page, New York's contract with M/A-Comm requires the company to allow other manufacturers to purchase licensing to make Open Sky radios. There's no reason Uniden and/or GRE could not get legal authority to start designing and building scanners now.
rfmobile said:When the radios are operating on a wireless carrier's AMPS/CDPD network, then yes I think someone hoping to listen in is going to be very disappointed.
The OpenSky networks built out and maintained by public service use fewer "cells" that cover larger geographical areas. Those cells might be comparable in size to ordinary EDACS sites and Motorola SmartZone coverage areas.
DaveNF2G said:I'd say that if M/A-Comm screws up in New York, then Open Sky will become obsolete almost overnight as they go out of business.
ar5crash said:I don't believe m/a com will fail in ny. It is better than most systems in use in ny now. There will be alot scanner folks mad. Even aproved radios on the system will be tightly restricted. a channel scanned outside the working cell/cells, consumes capasity on the system. I'm just curious to hear the audio. every freq time shares 4 talk paths. our county will expand the states system for our capacity needs. there are alot of + and -. for instance portabe coverage is a no. but there is 97% mobile coverage state wide. with a vtac (repeater) in EVERY trunk that will give 97% portable coverage. but at 6k a-pop.
p.s. penn lost intrest and funding with it new govenors intrest.
n4voxgill said:or stated differently, does the six K include both the portable and vtac, and is a mobile radio also required?
DaveNF2G said:Actually, it's not as impossible as we had been led to believe previously.
As per a note on my home page, New York's contract with M/A-Comm requires the company to allow other manufacturers to purchase licensing to make Open Sky radios. There's no reason Uniden and/or GRE could not get legal authority to start designing and building scanners now.
mfn002 said:Slightly off-topic...What would happen to OpenSky if the government decides to mandate P25?