Why does the Nimisila site have two primary control channels listed .. could that be the problem ?
Could one of these be another tower . maybe Richfield ?
Just some thoughts ...
The reason why any non-simulcast site has one or 3+ control channels listed, or multiple primaries, is because somebody in that area won't fire up Unitrunker or Pro96Com and get updated, accurate information and submit it to the DB.
All non-simulcast sites have two CCs [except for maybe correctional sites, which may be set up different]. Pretty much a general rule though that non-simulcast MARCS and MARCS-IP sites have two control channels. Anything less in the DB means we have incomplete information, and anything more in the DB means that people have submitted additional information over time just saying "blah is now the control channel" without runnning Unitrunker or Pro96Com and letting us know exactly wht the current CC/AC are.
So if anyone happens to be in an area where a non-simulcast site lists 1 control channel or 3+ control channels, please consider running a trunking program, gathering accurate information about that particular trunked site, and submitting an update.
There actually may be some sites in the DB now for which NONE of the control channels are correct. Many of the sites came online early on in the IP buildout, and they often used "temporary" frequencies. And those sites usually have updated FCC licenses specific to the site now. But if nobody checks with a trunking program to see if the information we have jives with what the control channel is spitting out, we'll never know if we need to make corrections.
This isn't a rant at you KWs -- it's a plea to everyone to consider checking out what the trunked site is telling you with Pro96Com or Unitrunker, and then letting us know if we need to update information.
Mike
Mike