Maryland CAP Frequencies Question

[Dispatcher308]

I would like to know if anyone wants the Civil Air Patrol Frequencies & channel assignments for the Maryland Wing. if so I can post them on here or if someone can tell me what to post them under in the MD Section


Thanx Nathan

Also I have Pl Tones & Names of Repeaters with them

 

[ericcarlson]

Just click "Submit Changes" on the State of Maryland page to submit the info and we'll find a place for it. Thanks.

-Eric

 

[Llwellyn]

Yes, please post as much info as you can! Thank you.

 

[Guest]

148.125 - Civil Air Patrol Secondary Repeaters
148.150 - Civil Air Patrol Primary Repeaters

CAP Frequencies - Washington, DC Area
Updated 5/17/03

Frequency Description Modulation
120.3750 (1) Langley AFB 'Jaws' Push AM
123.0250 Pentagon VIP Transport AM
138.4250 Air - Air AM
139.1500 (1) Air-Air AM
139.9000 Air - Air AM
141.8500 Air - Air AM
142.3000 (1) Air - Air AM
143.8000 Hill AFB F-16's - Langley (updated 3/12/03) AM
228.9000 Huntress (NORAD) AM
234.6000 Huntress (NORAD) AM
225.0000 NORAD (updated 3/12/03) AM
255.8000 Huntress (NORAD) AM
271.0000 Huntress (NORAD) AM
282.4250 US Customs - Flies low cover; CAP handles high altitudes (updated 3/12/03) AM
303.0000 Mid-Air CAP Refueling AM
307.2500 CAP Control AM
320.6000 Refueling Boom Freq (updated 3/12/03) AM
324.0000 CAP Corrdination (updated 3/12/03) AM
357.1000 (1) Langley AFB 'Jaws" ops AM
360.7000 Washington Center AM
362.3000 AWAC/F-16's (Gator) AM
364.2000 E-3 AWACS AM
370.1000 (1) TACAMO Aircraft AM

Check out http://waldo_325.tripod.com/scannerheadman/
8)

 

[pro-97]

Frequency Description Modulation
120.3750 (1) Langley AFB 'Jaws' Push AM
123.0250 Pentagon VIP Transport AM
138.4250 Air - Air AM
139.1500 (1) Air-Air AM
139.9000 Air - Air AM
141.8500 Air - Air AM
142.3000 (1) Air - Air AM
143.8000 Hill AFB F-16's - Langley (updated 3/12/03) AM
228.9000 Huntress (NORAD) AM
234.6000 Huntress (NORAD) AM
225.0000 NORAD (updated 3/12/03) AM
255.8000 Huntress (NORAD) AM
271.0000 Huntress (NORAD) AM
282.4250 US Customs - Flies low cover; CAP handles high altitudes (updated 3/12/03) AM
303.0000 Mid-Air CAP Refueling AM
307.2500 CAP Control AM
320.6000 Refueling Boom Freq (updated 3/12/03) AM
324.0000 CAP Corrdination (updated 3/12/03) AM
357.1000 (1) Langley AFB 'Jaws" ops AM
360.7000 Washington Center AM
362.3000 AWAC/F-16's (Gator) AM
364.2000 E-3 AWACS AM
370.1000 (1) TACAMO Aircraft AM

Check out http://waldo_325.tripod.com/scannerheadman/
8)

They are not civil air patrols look at wiki at civil air patrols freq.s
love the link

 

[TinEar]

Someone thought CAP was Combat Air Patrol rather than Civil Air Patrol. The strange thing about that post is that there's nothing to identify the poster. I've never seen a message like that here on RR.

 

[ka3jjz]

And I recognize the list, even if the poster isn't shown - it comes from the old MilAirComms website, which in this case, is very out of date (2003 dates?) The previous threads are all from 2004. How this came up is beyond me, unless someone was trying to post (or was an artifact of) the recent outage for maintenance that Lindsay has mentioned. The time of 9am on the first message is circumstantial evidence - that's when the outage was scheduled for today. 73s Mike

 

[ScanManQSL]

Someone thought CAP was Combat Air Patrol rather than Civil Air Patrol. The strange thing about that post is that there's nothing to identify the poster. I've never seen a message like that here on RR.

I think their account got deleted.

 

[loumaag]

I think their account got deleted.

Indeed, this is what you see if an account is deleted (not just banned) and the posts are not removed. To the person who reported it, nothing sinister about it.

The question I have is why would someone drag an almost 3 year old thread up just to comment on how the list is incorrect? BTW, we didn't have a Wiki when this was posted so even that comment is incorrect.

 

[TinEar]

Indeed, this is what you see if an account is deleted (not just banned) and the posts are not removed. To the person who reported it, nothing sinister about it.

The question I have is why would someone drag an almost 3 year old thread up just to comment on how the list is incorrect? BTW, we didn't have a Wiki when this was posted so even that comment is incorrect.

That message with no ID on it appeared this morning as a new post and the thread was suddenly in bold type at the top of the Maryland forum. I guess that's why it drew comments before anyone realized it was from 2004. I guess the real question is why that old no-name post made its appearance. Perhaps it was just a blip of some type in the database that burped it up and spat it out.

 

[loumaag]

That message with no ID on it appeared this morning as a new post and the thread was suddenly in bold type at the top of the Maryland forum. I guess that's why it drew comments before anyone realized it was from 2004. I guess the real question is why that old no-name post made its appearance. Perhaps it was just a blip of some type in the database that burped it up and spat it out.

Interesting...I will contact the boss and ask him what he was doing this AM. That is the only way such an event would happen. Thanks for the updated info.

 

[TinEar]

Interesting...I will contact the boss and ask him what he was doing this AM. That is the only way such an event would happen. Thanks for the updated info.

Thinking a bit more about it, it's the thread itself that got spit out and suddenly bold at the top of the forum - not necessarily that single message. It's just that once the thread became bold, it was assumed the last message with no name was new. I think I'll quit blathering about this now. :roll:

Alan