The latest reported comments from the Uvalde ISD chief, Arredondo, was that the reason he did not take 'either of his two "police" radios' was because he wanted to keep his hands free if he needed to use his own handgun. That begs the question of whether there is a shortage of radio holsters or cases with belt clips. He is also saying that he did not consider himself the incident commander, and thought someone else was in control, though he did not specify who that person would be: a Texas DPS officer, or the Uvalde County sheriff (or a senior deputy)?The New York Post reported the same thing a few days ago, albeit unconfirmed at the time. Now in his "defense", IF he was on scene, I would assume about 20 other people around him had radios and he could have stood right next to one of them. Does anyone know if Arredondo was even at the scene?
That;s my thinking as well.You could have a trillion dollar advanced radio system that does absolutely no good if you don't have the damn radio in your hand. Totally unacceptable.
I'm sure they've increased their trust with this new item.Doesn't matter how this goes now, they screwed this up with their shifting stories. They've lost the trust of the people that they are supposed to protect. Continuing to hide behind the veil of secrecy isn't helping. I'm sure the truth will eventually come out, but the trust is broken at this point.
According to a letter obtained by Vice News from an attorney representing Uvalde, local authorities fear that some of the material could have “highly embarrassing information” related to the police response. The letter was written by a private law firm to lobby the state’s attorney general, who will rule which records ultimately will be released to the public.
The attorneys for Uvalde argue that body-camera footage, 911 calls, emails, and texts related to the shooting should not be released, arguing that some of the information is “not of legitimate concern to the public” and that releasing materials such as police training guides and policy manuals could reveal “methods, techniques, and strategies for preventing and predicting crime.” They also argue that many records should remain private as the shooting is investigated by state and federal authorities
Scape goat blaming communications. If even so there was no to zero reception let's see it. In end the person who decided to cheap out their radio system should be held responsible if the facts are true there was a communications issue which I find hard to believe.
No system is designed for 100% in building coverage. None. There isn't a single system that doesn't have some dead areas in these 30dB buildings. Every_Single_Rural radio system is designed for mobile coverage. Not portable. It would cost BILLIONS of dollars to build out a Texas statewide system designed for in building coverage.
I don't think you are going to "hold anyone responsible" for that system design 20 years ago. Now if you want to go after them for not doing a damn thing to enhance anything in those 20 years since, fire away.
The problem is the system in question has only been in place for a little over a decade but in-building coverage hasn't really become the concern that it is today until the last 5 years or so and under current standards, existing construction is exempted from requirements to ensure in-building coverage. Some systems are designed for 100% indoor coverage but those systems tend to be purpose built for a specific campus (much smaller scale with local RF infrastructure). Now what you see going on in some jurisdictions is that fire marshals are going around and discovering buildings which have coverage issues (usually part of annual inspections) and relaying that information to other agencies which may need to be aware of it so they can build/make communications plans as necessary. In most jurisdictions these days, new commercial construction is required to meet in-building coverage standards or buildings are required to be retrofit when renovations are performed (renovation requirements varies with jurisdiction).
Sure, you can go into Eagle Pass PD with a 100 RSSI and still not talk out of the building because of the noise floor at the tower site. There has been zero local funding for maintenance or expansion for this system since it's inception.Along those lines, one MRG agency I worked on had no coverage inside the SO. Not necessarily due to weak signal but due to extreme interference from electronics inside the building. The VHF noise floor was around -80 dBm throughout most of facility.
The problem is the system in question has only been in place for a little over a decade but in-building coverage hasn't really become the concern that it is today until the last 5 years or so and under current standards, existing construction is exempted from requirements to ensure in-building coverage. Some systems are designed for 100% indoor coverage but those systems tend to be purpose built for a specific campus (much smaller scale with local RF infrastructure). Now what you see going on in some jurisdictions is that fire marshals are going around and discovering buildings which have coverage issues (usually part of annual inspections) and relaying that information to other agencies which may need to be aware of it so they can build/make communications plans as necessary. In most jurisdictions these days, new commercial construction is required to meet in-building coverage standards or buildings are required to be retrofit when renovations are performed (renovation requirements varies with jurisdiction).
Sure, you can go into Eagle Pass PD with a 100 RSSI and still not talk out of the building because of the noise floor at the tower site. There has been zero local funding for maintenance or expansion for this system since it's inception.
Where were all the " when all else fail" hams at. (sarcasm)
Scape goat blaming communications. If even so there was no to zero reception let's see it. In end the person who decided to cheap out their radio system should be held responsible if the facts are true there was a communications issue which I find hard to believe.
Where were all the " when all else fail" hams at. (sarcasm)
[/QUO
I hate to say it but a ham could at least have talked from inside the school to the officers outside.
You don't even need a 20 million dollar radio system to switch to TXCALL1D and talk to everyone on the scene for free.
MRG Zone 3
USBP Zone X
TXDPS Zone I
There was a ham there ready to help, but he was waiting on his yellow vest before he went in