• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Measuring Communications System Performance: What's the Norm

Status
Not open for further replies.

ahawkins

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi there. I am trying to get an idea on how data performance is measured over a trunked digital radio system. I came across this information on some technical website. It is listed below, talking about a given message model, and was wondering if this was a valid method of testing a digital/data system. The table is also listed in an attached file as well. I was also curious if there were any other methods of testing data system performance on a trunked system, that are used by the major vendors (ie Motorola, MA/COM, LTR, etc). I am trying to get an idea of how this is done in the industry, to include in a paper that I am putting together on digital radio systems. Thanks.



Using raw data bit rate to compare data systems can be very misleading. The actual system performance depends on a variety of factors including the protocol efficiency, signaling conditions, system loading, and the particular application being used. The true measurement of a public safety data system is the number of users the system can support with specific applications. This information is typically provided in a message model similar to the one shown below. By requiring each vendor to define the number of users a channel can support with a specified message model, a customer can make a true comparison of the data system’s performance.

Example Message Model for Law Enforcement.

Message Inbound (to Base) Outbound (to Mobile)
Bytes msg/usr/hr Bytes msg/usr/hr
Login 253 1 185 1
LP Inquiry 193 5 256 5
Email with
Confirmation 386 3 212 3
DL by Number 186 2 225 2
DL by Name 162 2 232 2
Changing Status 148 6 52 6
Changing Status
Broadcast 10 chan 0 0 148 60
CAD Query 196 5 226 5
Log out 172 1 74 1
CAD-to-car 50 1 200 1
Field Report 7000 0.5 3000 0.5
Mug shot 250 0.5 7000 0.5
AVL 40 12 75 12
 
D

DaveNF2G

Guest
You're taking a big risk trying to do serious research by asking questions on a web message board. How are you going to validate the sources? Anybody could come on here and post b.s. - how would you know?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top