-
To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:
Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.
If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.
To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.
The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.
For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).
This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.
Midland GMRS Antenna Questions
- Thread starter KK6HRW
- Start date
- Status
mmckenna
I ♥ Ø
Yes. The cut charts, or if this antenna came "tuned" from the factory, are usually ~close~, but not right on. Your specific installation will impact the antennas resonate point. It's always best to check the SWR after completed installation.
No idea what that is, got a link?
mmckenna
I ♥ Ø
Those work about as well as a 1/4 wave UHF antenna. Not sure I'd agree with the claimed 3dB. Since they don't show dBd or dBi, we'd have to assume the worst.
Essentially, this is what they look like on the inside:
Of course, that is a Laird model, so no telling what cheap Chinese junk Midland is using. But you can't take a 6" long whip and stuff it in a 3" tall can and expect it to work well.
You'd do better with a regular 1/4 wave whip. It'll give you a lot more useable bandwidth, such as covering down to the 70cm band as well as GMRS.
Essentially, this is what they look like on the inside:
Of course, that is a Laird model, so no telling what cheap Chinese junk Midland is using. But you can't take a 6" long whip and stuff it in a 3" tall can and expect it to work well.
You'd do better with a regular 1/4 wave whip. It'll give you a lot more useable bandwidth, such as covering down to the 70cm band as well as GMRS.
N4KVE
Member
I use this exact antenna. It works very well, & can get into the 400 foot repeater perfectly from 50 miles away. I would throw a similar Midland, Tram, or Browning antenna in the trash.Those work about as well as a 1/4 wave UHF antenna. Not sure I'd agree with the claimed 3dB. Since they don't show dBd or dBi, we'd have to assume the worst.
Essentially, this is what they look like on the inside:
Of course, that is a Laird model, so no telling what cheap Chinese junk Midland is using. But you can't take a 6" long whip and stuff it in a 3" tall can and expect it to work well.
You'd do better with a regular 1/4 wave whip. It'll give you a lot more useable bandwidth, such as covering down to the 70cm band as well as GMRS.
I agree with the "...you won't even know it's there..." in the marketing copy. I purchased a version of that style and the poor performance was as expected. I will never sell it as I loan it out for others to test and understand why an antenna like that would be used.
mmckenna
I ♥ Ø
It's the same thing that happened with CB radio.
The manufacturers want you to think that a low profile antenna will work. They don't want consumers to not buy the product due to high profile antennas, complex installation, or even annoying things like licensing. They sell these products because it's what people want, not what they need.
Low profile antennas. Cigarette lighter powered. No/little mention of licensing. Just sell the product as fast as you can.
Like CB, these radio services (GMRS, MURS, FRS) would be much more useful if consumers understood the technical requirements.
Many years ago Icom sold a really nice FRS portable radio. It was what many purists were screaming for. Nice durable radio, lots of useful functions, and had a full length 1/4 wave flexible antenna. They also sold the same model with the cute little stubby antenna. After a while, Icom sort of stopped selling the full 1/4 wave versions because consumers purchased based off looks, not performance. It was a shame, since it really improved performance. But trying to get consumers to understand antennas is a waste of oxygen.
The manufacturers want you to think that a low profile antenna will work. They don't want consumers to not buy the product due to high profile antennas, complex installation, or even annoying things like licensing. They sell these products because it's what people want, not what they need.
Low profile antennas. Cigarette lighter powered. No/little mention of licensing. Just sell the product as fast as you can.
Like CB, these radio services (GMRS, MURS, FRS) would be much more useful if consumers understood the technical requirements.
Many years ago Icom sold a really nice FRS portable radio. It was what many purists were screaming for. Nice durable radio, lots of useful functions, and had a full length 1/4 wave flexible antenna. They also sold the same model with the cute little stubby antenna. After a while, Icom sort of stopped selling the full 1/4 wave versions because consumers purchased based off looks, not performance. It was a shame, since it really improved performance. But trying to get consumers to understand antennas is a waste of oxygen.
And would be much cheaper.
Are you talking about the one above I posted?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
