They're out there...
None of the following is meant to discourage, but merely to inform. This post got a bit outta hand
closing in on 2 years now of fairly heavy focusing on low-band FM has brought surprising results, but at a cost of non-trivial time and effort. gonna just hit the highlights
My observations:
1. They're out there, but casual scanning will be disappointing for most i think. as most people have a life with time commitments that are incompatible with the time and effort expenditure that were required for me to achieve my results.
2. You have to be close for most anything that has a local origin. Skip from fort hood is almost easier
than the transmitter next door.
2. 30-50MHz is the best bet. 50-54- the time wasted due to ham activity (no offense intended ham's) i have concluded makes it too tricky.
3. The standard conventional wisdom and suggestions are where you'll do best starting out.
4. After you have gotten the hang of it, forget #3
5. 50khz seems to be the best bang for your buck.
6. #5 is right until you catch a xx.18 or a xx.88 which conform to neither 25 or 50khz spacing. (but you won't catch me wasting my time doing a 10khz search, and only rarely a 5khz if a turbo search function is possible.)
7. EVERYTHING between 30 and 87.975 apparently is fair game. if a rural school bus gets stepped on, the big green machine doesn't care. neither do i. i just wish the school board would get em some new radios and quit clogging up my scanners.
over 54 is active too, i just dunno how much. Scanners as a general rule don't cover this range and those that do are unlikely to be utilized for this niche. those are likely some reasons there are few reports of use. in 3 months with my beautiful new-to-me BR330XT i have snagged 2 60's. but only on one occasion for each has chatter been heard so far and the finds were 2 days apart. now if you check out this excellent site, you'll see that, at least in his area, it seems over 54 is as active as under 54
https://kf4lmt.wordpress.com/
high praise from me is rare so its worth a look for many reasons.
8. infrequent use, short range propagation, and normally low altitude of helos make life difficult (the majority of my experience with low band has been 90% helo/osprey with ground to helo and ground to ground rounding out the rest. well HAHO training used low-band but i dunno how to classify that... i mean it was air to air...)
9. but on the bright side, between 30-50MHz, i have discovered exactly 20 freqs (as of last month) used for voice comms in this period. this breaks down to an average of about 1 a month, though the finds were often clustered. i have also heard a handful of others mentioned (ie: "what freqs are we using this time?" "XX.XX and XX.X") but never heard personally used. Of those 20, 16 were 30's and 4 were 40's. 36 and 38's seem to get heavy rotation and there is a .75 ending on about a third of the total with XX.X00 being about another third. now these are just what i have personally noted and confirmed. BUT, one should know that i have only recently, and very begrudgingly, started searching in 25kHz steps regularly between 30-50. I have normally stuck with 50kHz steps in searching, so that should be kept in mind as to the possible bias in my breakdown. the .88 and .18's were only found due to signal stalker catching them (confirmed via 2 other scanners as correct) and both were OH-58D's which are sadly no longer around.
10. prob the most important suggestion tho is - Forget About Tones - 151.4 does let 150.0 through, no question. but use that as a guide. search and store's that show a 151.4, add them to your scan list. put the frequency in and set tone to search and you'll see how rarely anything pops up. usually they are directly over my head or have been talking for a loonnng time before the scanner shows a tone. btw the first time i picked up the famous fort hood range control 30.45FM(i think thats it), my bc346xt showed...PL146.2. everytime. for a solid half hour. only had one scanner at the time so couldn't do a pass through test but it is something to keep in mind.
basically the only reasons to ever use a tone setting is if you have a spurious RF issue, which is often a problem, or on the off chance of there being other users. example: 39.95 has been reported as in use by the military in my area, however 100miles away from me, stokes co school buses use 39.96. bleeds right on through. therefore i have to set a tone on 39.95. i have never heard a peep on it either.
if you have read to this point, you better check the time, cause you are late for something. as am i...