Of course no one wants to be the one denying "the boys in blue the tools they need to do their jobs"
and DARE ask, why are we buying "$6000 walkie talkies" and costly infrastructure in places where it clearly is not needed?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVA1xRrWBuk
This reminds me of "
The Emperor Wears No Clothes ",
where everyone dares not speak the obvious truth.
It's not PC to question enormous comm purchases for
those who keep us safe from the "terrorists".
If you do, to some, it's akin to aiding terrorism
and criminals.
Several years ago, when our state started the conversation
about a statewide trunked system.
I went to one of the original meetings on the subject.
They were explaining how a trooper will be able to stand
on the beach at the Pacific Ocean with a portable
and talk to another trooper on a portable 300+ miles
away at the Idaho border.
At question & answer time, I raised my hand and asked,
Under what conceivable emergency would a portable
to portable contact between troopers be
necessary across the entire state?
The gave me the deer-in-the-headlights look.
As if I were speaking a foreign language.
They had no answer, except "a large incident".
I got several glares from the main 'cheerleaders'.
You'd think I had desecrated Old Glory or something.
I was the ONLY average citizen who bothered to attend.