doctordave
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2003
- Messages
- 1,562
- Reaction score
- 0
Out of curiosity, I purchased the Comtelco tri-band scanner antenna (11331B-Z) as well as the Maxrad Bmax1000 scanner antenna (both have similar commercially advertised coverage ranges for VHF-High, UHF & 800 MHZ public safety bands). Against these, I compared a .062 whip cut at 18.5 inches. All were used w/ an NMO mount on my stationary vehicle & monitoring on my Uniden 996.
After testing for reception of a number of proximal & near edge of range fixed stations on 39, 151, 152, 155, 159, 460, 856 & 868 MHZ.....I was able to note no obvious differences in terms of signal strength bars or audio quality - across all 3 antennas. Not at all a scientific study.....but some food for thought for those who might be seeking a basic antenna to use on such bands.
I must admit that I was impressed with the performance of the $8 whip against the $25-30 antennas. For a more detailed comparison of a large number of antennas, the northwestintercepts page is always a great resource:
http://www.northwestradio.com/interceptnw/antennas.htm
After testing for reception of a number of proximal & near edge of range fixed stations on 39, 151, 152, 155, 159, 460, 856 & 868 MHZ.....I was able to note no obvious differences in terms of signal strength bars or audio quality - across all 3 antennas. Not at all a scientific study.....but some food for thought for those who might be seeking a basic antenna to use on such bands.
I must admit that I was impressed with the performance of the $8 whip against the $25-30 antennas. For a more detailed comparison of a large number of antennas, the northwestintercepts page is always a great resource:
http://www.northwestradio.com/interceptnw/antennas.htm
Last edited: