My feeling is that additional receiving igates are never a problem. They do not increase rf burden on the channel, they only increase the chances of of a message reaching the IS network. A bidirectional igate (what I’m planning) will add some rf burden on the channel but only enough to relay to local stations. Lastly, a digipeater would be the most likely to contribute to rf channel saturation so that’s the last option only to be used when outside of a coverage area.
Im considering this because there aren’t any igates in the valley here. The nearest igate is 21 miles away over a couple of ridges. There’s one digipeater nine miles away over a ridge with the next being 39 miles away on the other side of a 14,000 foot peak. Distances to these sites will increase during most of my trips. None of these sites are even close to line of sight.
My thought is that by being an igate and connected to APRS-is directly, I can keep my own rf traffic to a minimum while in range of a cellular tower, while also helping other’s reach the network. When I roam outside of cellular service, I can maybe help others reach an igate at the expense of some additional rf traffic.
From a tactical perspective, this seems to me to be the spirit of what APRS was meant to be, but I’m not an Elmer here… I’d love to hear more about why this is a bad idea or how it’s not best practice. I’m definitely still learning and can just operate as a normal APRS station for myself… it just doesn’t expand the network at all.
I look forward to learning. That’s why I’m here.
Regards,
Brian