I do not want any BS about this, it was decided on this board that there would be a database, well there isn't. so
http://MCQCTONES.20m.com
http://MCQCTONES.20m.com
K2NNJ said:Like many others i'm sure........I don't want some whackjob hitting my dept's pager tone's.QUOTE]
Um, we have scanners and equipment that can decode them. Doesn't matter if you're not willing to give them out.. we'll just wait for the next fire pager test or call...
Same issues with PLs and DPLs... if someone really wants to do it, anything can happen. Could always drive around with a service monitor and get your attention. =)
nosoup4u said:Now my feeling is that posting PL tones and Repeater input freqs is worse that QCII tones. Lets face it, any idiot can record the pager tones with a tape recorder and replay them over the air if he wanted to. Most of us remember what happened a couple years ago when some idiot was doing just that. Having a PL tone and repeater input freq pretty much gives anyone the keys to the repeater. This is probably why these 1 frequency LTR systems have become so popular, it keeps people off the repeaters.
Bottom line is that if someone wants to cause trouble, he's going to figiure out how to do it with or without any information he can get from our scanner sites.
carbineone said:legitimate reason would be for the new bearcat scanners with tone decoders. Now I can just put the tones in and don't have to listen to chit chat on the channel just the tone out.
K2NNJ,K2NNJ said:That is NOT legitimate.
mondaro said:I hope you guys are kidding here. What difference does it make anyway as one poster said he is worrying about the " Whack Job " coming to his fire well if that whack job hears it on the radio he is coming what ever tone, PL or frequency he hears it on. So unless you encrypted it makes no difference in the world what is posted.
Tony Mondaro
Chief
North Arlington EMS
Bergen County NJ