Constables are a tremendous asset!
(I preface this by saying... in Tennessee) Constables were a state Constitutional office, like the Sheriff. Constables had similar powers as a Sheriff here, which, unlike many areas, are full service law enforcement agencies (can arrest, can patrol, investigate, etc.)
Unlike traditional law enforcement lines of authority, the Constable was NOT under the Sheriff, and as a result, were free to direct their own actions.
This autonomy greatly frightened many in the community and in law enforcement, because, as y'all know, there are agreements, and deals, and arrangements. Constables didn't have to adhere to those.
So, the actions of a few lowest-common-denominator Constables gave these people the rope they needed to first remove Constables from the Constitution, and then, by power of the County Mayor, abolish their office.
Pretty sad, because, in many counties around here, especially at night, there are only a few patrolmen for several hundred square miles of jurisdiction. Constables were elected in a specific community (voting district), and tended to patrol just there. A Constable might be the only law you saw outside of an election year.
I am very pro Constable. I wish we could bring them back in Roane, Loudon and Anderson. They could use them.
Far as Bebb, I was a police officer back when he was district attorney in Monroe County in the late 90's. He never directly did anything to me, but... I know things. (shrugs)
On the multiple charge thing: There is another reason for that, besides trying to ensure a d-bag stays in jail for at least a weekend. Justice is a big wheel like on wheel of fortune. DA's are constantly making deals with the defense attorneys. You have to give them wiggle room to work. That way they have a charge or two to drop in return for a plea agreement. Neither prosecuting nor defense attorneys nor the judge wants a trial. They want a line of guilties, then a line of pleas, then lunch. Not bitter, that's just the way it is.
Lastly, on proof and the radio, from personal experience, it is all up to the jury foreman if it even makes it that far. There is no way for the poor man to establish that he always listens to the radio when he's in the car, and not monitoring for potential stings. It was on, it was tuned to a law enforcement fq, and he was listening. Without reading the elements of the offense, I am betting that is a done deal if they don't plea it away, or the man can prove somehow he was framed or entrapped.
CAPTLPOL1 - THANK you for taking the time to talk to your legislators. I try to be as vocal as I can. This year I've been pushing for some oversight on the out of control use of encryption limiting transparency in government. When the fire department is running encryption, you KNOW a line's been crossed. None of the people I've contacted care even a little bit, though...
Shawn