Montana Federal Beaverhead/Deer Lodge National Forest and Lolo National Forest

jjwhite29

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
142
Location
Philipsburg, Montana
So after going most of the summer without hearing Beaverhead/Deer Lodge National Forest on my scanner here in Philipsburg, I decided to try something out and take out all the Tones and put them on search. I than started hearing them on my scanner and realized that the most of the tones are wrong for the Data base for some on the sites. I wanted to see if anyone else is in the area and have the same problem. Here are the tones that work so I can finally here forest service in my area. So far the Bitterroot National Forest seems to match up.

Lolo National Forest

East Richmond Peak- CTCSS -127.3
White Mountain - CTCSS-127.3
University Mountain- CTCSS-127.3
Stark Mountain- CTCSS-127.3

Beaverhead/Deer Lodge National Forest

Emerine- CTCSS- 123.0
Henderson CTCSS-123.0
Jack Mountain CTCSS-123.0
 

ecps92

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2002
Messages
11,456
Location
Taxachusetts
Appears that the RRDB maybe showing the input tones, not the Output )

The wiki could use a look thru as well - missing some sites or site names changed

So after going most of the summer without hearing Beaverhead/Deer Lodge National Forest on my scanner here in Philipsburg, I decided to try something out and take out all the Tones and put them on search. I than started hearing them on my scanner and realized that the most of the tones are wrong for the Data base for some on the sites. I wanted to see if anyone else is in the area and have the same problem. Here are the tones that work so I can finally here forest service in my area. So far the Bitterroot National Forest seems to match up.

Lolo National Forest

East Richmond Peak- CTCSS -127.3
White Mountain - CTCSS-127.3
University Mountain- CTCSS-127.3
Stark Mountain- CTCSS-127.3

Beaverhead/Deer Lodge National Forest

Emerine- CTCSS- 123.0
Henderson CTCSS-123.0
Jack Mountain CTCSS-123.0
 

PJH

Database Admin
Database Admin
Joined
Aug 23, 2002
Messages
3,591
Yes, there was a submitter that used official information and submitted it without knowing how it works.

I’ve been undoing all those submissions as time permits.
 
Top