More Changes to the DeKalb Co. FD/EMS TG's?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 23, 2001
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
AFTER DCFD (AND THE REST OF THE 0307 SYSTEM) WENT STRICTLY TYPE II, THE FD/EMS LEFT THE OLD WAY OF HAVING SEPARATED (FD FROM EMS) DISPATCHING, AND STARTED USING FD/EMS NORTH DISPATCH AND FD/EMS SOUTH DISPATCH, RUMOR HAS IT (AMONG SEVERAL DCFD OFFICERS) THAT THE LAYOUT WILL SOON BE CHANGED AGAIN MAKING FD NORTH, FD SOUTH, EMS NORTH AND EMS SOUTH.

HOW SOON IT WILL TAKE PLACE I DON'T KNOW, BUT DON'T YOU FEEL SORRY FOR THE POOR SCHMUCKS THAT HAVE TO GO AROUND THE WHOLE COUNTY RE-GROUPING ALL THE EQUIPMENT?
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
15,180
Reaction score
2,012
Location
Indianapolis, IN
Umm can't they just do it remotely using a dynamic regrouping?
 

DanRollman

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
603
Location
Atlanta, GA
georgiafire133 said:
AFTER DCFD (AND THE REST OF THE 0307 SYSTEM) WENT STRICTLY TYPE II, THE FD/EMS LEFT THE OLD WAY OF HAVING SEPARATED (FD FROM EMS) DISPATCHING, AND STARTED USING FD/EMS NORTH DISPATCH AND FD/EMS SOUTH DISPATCH

If I recall correctly, that change actually took place quite a while before the Type II switch. They had already switched to North and South Dispatch back when they were still "A" (000-1) and "C" (000-3). They did it because the "EMS Dispatcher" was way overworked compared to the fire dispatcher. Splitting the county at Memorial Drive evened the two dispatchers jobs out.

georgiafire133 said:
HOW SOON IT WILL TAKE PLACE I DON'T KNOW, BUT DON'T YOU FEEL SORRY FOR THE POOR SCHMUCKS THAT HAVE TO GO AROUND THE WHOLE COUNTY RE-GROUPING ALL THE EQUIPMENT?

With the exception of a preference for correct text tags on the radio screen, reprogramming would not be required just to use their existing talkgroups differently. The Type II change actually required reprogramming because the talkgroup numbers themselves had to change.

Also, the rumor I have heard is that they are considering moving RESPONSES off the dispatch channels, not actually having four dispatch channels. In other words, they would continue to have only North and South dispatch, but units responding on EMS traffic would respond and operate on a TAC channel. It could turn out to be similar to how Gwinnett does it, assigning a TAC for all incidents and having units currently on a scene, no matter how small or large, communicate with the dispatcher on a talkgroup OTHER than the main dispatch talkgroup (i.e TAC-2 in Gwinnett).

Again, this is just the rumor I heard. Who knows what the real plan is, or would turn out to be in reality anyway. But if what I heard is true (it may not be), it probably wouldn't even require changing text tags on the radios... just using the TAC channels differently.

Dan
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top