MSU Shooting Confusion NYT

Status
Not open for further replies.

bob550

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
2,075
Location
Albany County, NY
I think this article spoke more to the hysteria that resulted from this incident. With today's instant communications of Social Networking and texting, it's easy to get the word out to the university community without a single scanner or app being involved. The danger to doing that in an uncontrolled environment is that students, many away from home for the first time, probably overreacted to whatever they saw and heard at the time. Even the local and university police were initially confused and chasing down what turned out to be worthless leads. Not uncommon in a situation like this. And yes, the "E" word was mentioned, but in an ultimately negative manner.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,515
I think this article spoke more to the hysteria that resulted from this incident. With today's instant communications of Social Networking and texting, it's easy to get the word out to the university community without a single scanner or app being involved. The danger to doing that in an uncontrolled environment is that students, many away from home for the first time, probably overreacted to whatever they saw and heard at the time. Even the local and university police were initially confused and chasing down what turned out to be worthless leads. Not uncommon in a situation like this. And yes, the "E" word was mentioned, but in an ultimately negative manner.
Yes, it is more likely that nearly all of the students got active shooter warning messages on their smartphones from an alerting application furnished by the school itself than from a scanner or scanner app. It is puzzling why Boadcastify and Scanners are mentioned at all.

Look at this bit:

"As time ticked by and the civilian audience on Broadcastify grew, a feedback loop of terror and confusion took hold among students, staff members and even law enforcement."

What evidence do they provide that the "civilian audience" contributed to the false 911 reports?
 
Last edited:

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,515
Probably mentioned because the Times got it's material from Broadcastify.
Sure, but it goes a bit beyond an acknowledgement. It would be like NYT featuring a crime picture taken by Weegee and then implying that his pictures are motivating copy cat murders.
 

GlobalNorth

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 2, 2020
Messages
2,318
Location
Fort Misery
College students, especially undergrads, are not known for providing timely and accurate assessments of incidents. Many call 911 to find out what is happening and the call centers are inundated with these requests for information and are trying to weed through the unimportant to find the critical information.

Many UGs act on emotion and not on rationalism. Adding to the confusion is the reluctance of university/college PD chiefs and administrators to accurately disseminate what they do know to professors, students, and staffers over the fears that one of them may well be a shooter or associated with shooter/s.

ALL incidents start as a FUBAR situation. They may be sorted out before PD/FD/EMS get there or it can take hours to get enough information for a preliminary press release.

Most NYT articles are written for sensationalism and not accuracy.
 

Golay

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
542
Location
Nankin Township Michigan
Yes, it is more likely that nearly all of the students got active shooter warning messages on their smartphones from an alerting application furnished by the school itself than from a scanner or scanner app. It is puzzling why Boadcastify and Scanners are mentioned at all.

Look at this bit:

"As time ticked by and the civilian audience on Broadcastify grew, a feedback loop of terror and confusion took hold among students, staff members and even law enforcement."

What evidence do they provide that the "civilian audience" contributed to the false 911 reports?

Your first paragraph is exactly what happened. Local law enforcement and the university put out a "Be on the lookout" on every social media and instant messaging platform they could think of, asking everyone to relay any information they may know. So 911 was getting flooded with calls from a thousand people about anything they deemed may be suspicious. And that's not really an exaggeration.

This had nothing to do with Broadcastify.
 

chrismol1

P25 TruCking!
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
1,321
yup I was listening to the feed as it unfolded it was chaos. Reports from all over campus at the same time, any loud noise was a 'gun shot'. I want to say people saw the cops and reported on people with guns as there were reports where cops were already located
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,515
Your first paragraph is exactly what happened. Local law enforcement and the university put out a "Be on the lookout" on every social media and instant messaging platform they could think of, asking everyone to relay any information they may know. So 911 was getting flooded with calls from a thousand people about anything they deemed may be suspicious. And that's not really an exaggeration.

This had nothing to do with Broadcastify.
We have a local phenomenon where my fellow townspeople idiots , freak out (on Facebook or Nextdoor) whenever they see or hear a helicopter overhead. They tell each other to call 911 to ask what is happening. I don't of course because I am hearing the police helicopter on my scanner. Usually it is a chase after someone bailing from a traffic stop, kids escaping from a local youth home, and once it was a (K9 dog escaped from its handlers home (how embarrassing!)
 

KC2CQD

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
100
Location
Angola, NY
Yes, it is more likely that nearly all of the students got active shooter warning messages on their smartphones from an alerting application furnished by the school itself than from a scanner or scanner app. It is puzzling why Boadcastify and Scanners are mentioned at all.

Look at this bit:

"As time ticked by and the civilian audience on Broadcastify grew, a feedback loop of terror and confusion took hold among students, staff members and even law enforcement."

What evidence do they provide that the "civilian audience" contributed to the false 911 reports?
Sounds like typical media bias to me
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top