mkewman said:
Do multicouplers significantly degrade reception?
A coupler splits the available signal, so the ideal coupler, one with absolutely no loss, gives you the original signal strength divided by the number of outputs at each output. (A coupler to 2 radios gives half the signal at each radio.) Real-world couplers have loss, so you get less than 1/(number of outputs) at each output.
Amplified couplers, if they're well made, make up for these losses - and no more than that - in the amplifier, so the only downside is the increased noise level. (A wide-frequency, extremely low noise level amplifier can easily cost as much as a few high-end scanners.) If the coupler amplifier gives gain over the input you run the risk of overloading the scanner. (GRE - read: most Radio Shack - scanners are particularly prone to overload.)
I've never used one, but i've considered it... they're pretty expensive though.
Considering the cost of a good coupler, unless you're running more than 4 scanners it's probably no more expensive to use 1 antenna for each scanner.
The only use i can really see one for is if you're doing something like covert operations, and you're using a cell-look-a-like antenna or something.
Multiple
covert scanners in a car? I'd think that all that equipment visible from outside the car would sort of give it away.