Nac of BA0?

[Gator596]

I finally had a hit on what I had read here was a DHS/ICE simplex freq 164.9625. It came in strong and in the clear but it had a NAC of BA0 (that third character is a zero).
A quick search here came up negative for that NAC.
I have never seen a NAC like that. Any ideas?
I was listening on a bcd396xt.

 

[ecps92]

9625 is not just DHS agencies.

Across the USA it's used by VA Hospitals, Postal Svc [80's/90's], USFS, USAF, Federal Interops and yes CBP and ICE.

What type of Traffic?

I finally had a hit on what I had read here was a DHS/ICE simplex freq 164.9625. It came in strong and in the clear but it had a NAC of BA0 (that third character is a zero).
A quick search here came up negative for that NAC.
I have never seen a NAC like that. Any ideas?
I was listening on a bcd396xt.

 

[Gator596]

Traffic was a female voice saying "I'm going up to the door now" or something similar.
I listened for another 20 minutes but didn't hear anything else.

 

[ecps92]

Could it be a Canadian Agency ? +/- Khz ??

Traffic was a female voice saying "I'm going up to the door now" or something similar.
I listened for another 20 minutes but didn't hear anything else.

 

[jf4164]

164.9625 Mhz--Very active

That frequency is very heavily used in South Florida by ICE/CBP--esp in the Palm Beach area.

 

[ecps92]

Is it still Analog, 100.0 Hz?

That frequency is very heavily used in South Florida by ICE/CBP--esp in the Palm Beach area.

 

[prcguy]

I can enter a NAC of BA0 in my radio and it seems to work fine.
prcguy

 

[jf4164]

Yes. Stil 99.9% analogue in West Palm Beach with 100.0 p/l

 

[ecps92]

We know the NAC is a valid one..... Not sure what your point was

I can enter a NAC of BA0 in my radio and it seems to work fine.
prcguy

 

[prcguy]

The OP had never seen a NAC like that and so far nobody had mentioned it is a useable one. Why is that confusing?
prcguy

We know the NAC is a valid one..... Not sure what your point was

 

[WayneH]

The OP had never seen a NAC like that and so far nobody had mentioned it is a useable one. Why is that confusing?
prcguy

Because the OP meant he's never seen anyone using it, not whether the NAC was valid for use as one.

No harm no foul.