The stock antenna may be very lossy, thus reducing the level of interfering signals that hit the RF stage of the radio. The aftermarket antenna may not be so lossy, so the radio gets overloaded.
Well, it promises to be a very interesting hobby. Are more
expensive Baofengs (meaning
ALL of them) apt to suffer similarly? The reason I ask is that I actually
like some of them.
I gave my wife a 5R just for the siren. (It's nice for any woman who on occasion walks in underground garages. Just push a button and all hell breaks loose. It also has the FM radio built in.) It works okay as a 2-way walkie-talkie and I have no problems using them for a nearby lake and hiking trails. Apart from that, I bought a Baofeng
UV-82 8-watt, a
BF-H6 (Radioddity
GA-510) 10-watt and a
BF-H7 10-watt (both set at 5-watt MEDIUM), and I
really like them, despite the fact that they look and feel like bricks. I reckon there's a 5-watt Japanese radio in my future
On general principle, dump the cheap, Chinese radios. Most of them use a "radio on a chip" which is a complete receiver and transmitter on one piece of silicon. These ROCs are useful devices, but you need to sufficiently filter the RF before it gets to the chip otherwise the chip will become overloaded. The cheap, Chinese radios, because they are designed for the lowest possible price, leave out the filters.
Alas, easier said than done. Baofeng seems to rule YouTube. Range tests. Antenna tests. Most seem to involve Baofengs at one step or another. As I said above, I really like many of those cheap radios. If I'd known what you just wrote, I would have avoided the Baofengs in favor of...well, I don't know what I would have bought. Price is an issue and the Baofengs attracted me as addition to my bugout bag. As I scoured YouTube, however, it was Baofeng this and Baofeng that, and it wasn't long before I bought several radios for my bugout bag. And they actually may be okay for such a purpose, but for a hobbyist I get the proverbial you get what you pay for.
Do you really think they care? They can sell thousands of radios to unsuspecting customers world-wide. If a few customers complain, it's a drop in the bucket compared to their total sales. Yes, some steps have been taken to mitigate spurious emissions from the transmitters, but that's a measurable quantity. Overload of the receivers is more difficult to measure and there are no standards for it imposed by regulators like the FCC.
No. Some of my other hobbies are guns, knives and flashlights. Each of these require strong quality control. If a gun jams, if a knife is cheaply made and doesn't cut or lock, or a flashlight doesn't work, or the brightness and runtimes are not up to par, or if it's cheaply made, these things impact sales and companies can be run out of business. But in radios, companies apparently sweep their deficiencies under the carpet and few people are apparently the wiser.
When the signals, from all sources, not just your frequency of interest, hit the initial RF stages of the radio, the electronics become overloaded. You and a friend may be able to whisper to each other across an empty room, but turn on a large stereo system playing loud music and you will no longer be able to hear each other because your ears are overloaded. The same concept applies in radio.
In my home, I have few competing signals. I actually have no signals in the area in which I live. I was listening to three guys having a conversation about computers. When I switched to a Nagoya clone antenna, I lost all signals; however, when I went back to my stock antenna, the conversation was still going on.
So what was going on? Was the Nagoya clone (Luiton) a cheap useless antenna? Or was it the fault of my cheap Baofeng radio? I don't know. If those same guys were on the air every day at the same time, I could run a few tests. Some people say that I shouldn't use antenna clones, that I should stick with the actual Nagoya NA-171. Others say antennas aren't rocket science, and that the Nagoya clones are as good as the real deal. I don't know. Again, I'd have to test it with the same conditions. But thanks for your valuable input!