Name that niose...

Status
Not open for further replies.

rbellows

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
103
Reaction score
26
Location
Midlands, SC
... this is a no-brainer for someone, but it confused me: A transmission on 121.500, unintelligible followed by what sounds exactly like an old car or home invasion alarm...for several minutes. :?: :?: :?:
 

jlh

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
207
Reaction score
14
rbellows, sounds like a plane's ELT ( emergency locator transmitter ). Sometimes they are triggered by accident. Heard one a few years ago, called the local airport, they tracked it down to a plane that was being worked on.

And then there is the chance that it actually a downed plane.
 

pocho

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2004
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
Or the pilot made a VERY hard landing (enough to set off the ELT). :lol:
 

CLB

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
Location
Goose Creek SC
9 G's are what's required to trigger an ELT.

If it was a rough landing, the dude has no landing gear anymore :lol:

I track these and EPIRBs in CAP all the time. Fatal crashes are to say the least, messy.
 

blutarsky

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Location
texas
rbellows said:
... this is a no-brainer for someone, but it confused me: A transmission on 121.500, unintelligible followed by what sounds exactly like an old car or home invasion alarm...for several minutes. :?: :?: :?:
i was wondering the same thing, actually. a couple weeks ago i was hearing the same thing, and it's since stopped (i locked out that channel for a while as my scanner kept stopping on it).

as i type this now, however, i'm picking up the same thing on 243.000 (though it's a little more faint, it's the same "whooping" sound). :?
 

jhooten

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
1,782
Reaction score
476
Location
Paige, Republic of Texas
Trivia question

Why was 243.00 chosen for the aircraft UHF Guard/ELT beacon freq?


This comment contains a clue:

as i type this now, however, i'm picking up the same thing on 243.000 (though it's a little more faint, it's the same "whooping" sound).
 

jlh

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
207
Reaction score
14
I cheated and looked it up, pretty cool idea.
 

ECPD279

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 9, 2002
Messages
820
Reaction score
57
Location
Bay Area, CA
jhooten said:
Trivia question

Why was 243.00 chosen for the aircraft UHF Guard/ELT beacon freq?

Because 243.000 is the first harmonic of 121.5 (ie 121.5x2=243) so 121.5 can be heard on 243 if military aircraft are involved in the search.
 

jhooten

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
1,782
Reaction score
476
Location
Paige, Republic of Texas
The same reason the original 5 amateur bands were allocated in the spectrum they were BTW.

3.5X2=7
3.5X4=14
3.5X6=21
3.5X8=28
7X2=14
7X3=21
7X4=28
And so on.
 

rtripp

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
CLB said:
9 G's are what's required to trigger an ELT.

If it was a rough landing, the dude has no landing gear anymore :lol:

I track these and EPIRBs in CAP all the time. Fatal crashes are to say the least, messy.

Hmm... The ELT's we used to use didn't take 9 g's. They would go off even in a sharp in-air maneuver. But, it was also made before 1975 8) .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top