NASA Helps Bring Airport Communications into the Digital Age

Status
Not open for further replies.

RaleighGuy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
17,641
Reaction score
27,790
Location
Raleigh, NC
For decades, airports have relied mainly on voice communications over unsecured radio frequencies, with landline phone calls as the only secure backup option. Going forward, the Aeronautical Mobile Aircraft Communication System (AeroMACS) will allow Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) staff in control towers to send safety-critical information digitally and securely – and should lead to shorter wait times on the tarmac.

 

Dude111

An Awesome Dude
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Messages
464
Reaction score
6
I agree...... Airplanes need RELIABLE communications.... They should stay analog!!

They have been ANALOGUE all these years,whats the problem all of a sudden??
 

alcahuete

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
2,873
Reaction score
2,788
Location
Southern California
Already been in the works long before this. Everything is going datacomm (CPDLC) at some point. It's being approached from an efficiency and safety perspective. I don't think anybody cares about encrypting the comms or going digital or anything, to be honest. It's all about efficiency.
 

spanky15805

Newbie
Joined
Sep 18, 2004
Messages
343
Reaction score
171
The current radios in place can transmit encrypted data, If the President says so. Climax is the next big thing coming to aviation radio at the same time 8.33khz makes it debut. ICAO has already completed all the testing with site spec's printed. It will take some infrastructure adjustment but it's only money... And the number of ads-b sites is about to go through the roof, 2025 would be my guess, unless the incoming DOT secretary makes it a higher priority.
 

Lynch_Christopher

Member
Database Admin
Joined
May 28, 2006
Messages
843
Reaction score
35
Location
Winthrop, Ma
I don't believe that aircraft voice communications will ever completely go away this will help supplement congestion on voice frequencies. I do agree that it is slowly going that way for example I know of one airline that has a VHF Frequency in the new york area to communicate with dispatch but a majority of the time the pilots use satcom to get in touch with maintenance control or the company dispatchers.

After doing some more research sounds like this is going to supplement DATACOMM and ACARS.

" AeroMACS will be supporting the FAA’s new DataComm program by allowing the offloading of large amounts of aircraft data from the VHF datalinks.14 This offloading will reduce safety traffic congestion on the legacy aviation VHF datalink networks, and thereby ensure critical Air Traffic Control (ATC) messages are not unnecessarily delayed between the FAA controllers and aircraft. More specifically, the highest concentration of sources, users, and stakeholders of information required for safe and regular flight operations occurs at the nation’s airports.15 Within the national airspace system, the airport is where aircraft are in closest proximity to each other and to a wide variety of service and operational support vehicles, personnel, infrastructure and service applications (such as air traffic controllers, aircraft pilots, airline operators, ramp operators, aircraft service providers, and emergency service, snow removal and deicing personnel, all of which contribute to safety and regularity of flight).16 Communications needs among these various elements of the air traffic system are growing rapidly and have outstripped the limited capacity for current safety spectrum. To accommodate increased aircraft and airport traffic without sacrificing safety requirements, the development of a next generation surface communications system was needed with the capacity to handle the current and future operational requirements as discussed above. "

 
Last edited:

alcahuete

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
2,873
Reaction score
2,788
Location
Southern California
I don't believe that aircraft voice communications will ever completely go away


That's correct, because you will have GA aircraft (at least for the forseeable future) that will not be operating with datacomm capabilities. It might be an extremely long time before a reasonably-priced unit is available, and then would a single pilot aircraft be expected to use it? Ehhhh...probably not.

However, with air carriers and business jets and such, I can absolutely see those voice comms. going away. That's the main/only reason the comms. system hasn't been revamped, even though congress made the money available a few years ago.
 

majoco

Stirrer
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Messages
4,315
Reaction score
998
Location
New Zealand
Lynch Christopher said:

I don't believe that aircraft voice communications will ever completely go away

The main advantage from an aircrew point of view is that you can hear every communication to you and all the other aircraft and so have a better idea where they all all and what they are going to do next.
 

trap5858

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 22, 2003
Messages
925
Reaction score
329
Location
Doylestown PA & Milton DE
The super secret stuff they need to tell the airplane they can do over the satellite communications that most commercial airlines have.
 

dzirzow

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Messages
28
Reaction score
17
Location
North Ridgeville, Ohio
Saddest part is I drive by Hopkins (NASA Glenn) everyday for work and plane spot there w/ scanners and didn't realize this testing was going on there for years. ugh
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top