Need help identifying unknown talkgroups in Howard County

Status
Not open for further replies.

tvengr

Well Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
10,750
Location
Baltimore County, MD
I think I have cataloged about 485 new Fire Radio IDs today alone. About 108 of them I am nearly 100% sure are correct.
Sounds like someone has a lot of free time. Thanks for all of your hard work! It will be interesting to see your final list.
 
Last edited:

markgrutz

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
126
Location
Ellicott City, Maryland
Sounds like someone has a lot of free time. Thanks for all of your hard work! It will be interesting to see your final list.

Oh, no... I have a job that allows me a lot of "messing around" time. Plus I have it somewhat automated. I also have a slight advantage of knowing how all of our radios were set up so I can quickly eliminate the wrong ones. Now with a brand new system, they were not creative when the blocked out the IDs so fire seems to fit neatly between 2, PD fits between 2 and so on. So its actually very easy right now, it's 5 years from now when radios have been lost, or re-assigned that it becomes a PITA to maintain. I will certainly publish what I have when I get it more or less polished.
 

tvengr

Well Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
10,750
Location
Baltimore County, MD
With dispatch, incident, and EMRC talkgroups, that is about all we need to monitor the fire system. There will be administration, interop, mutual aid, and some other talkgroups, but what we already have is pretty much all we need. Anything else is just icing on the cake. Now, we need to see which police talkgroups are monitorable.
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,386
Location
The OP
Unfortunately I do not have a strong enough signal here in Annapolis to decode voice channels (it's good until about Rt 32 and I-97 / Crownsville,) but I can receive the cch well enough to decode TG and channels assignments. There are quite a few TGs that I've logged during pre-cutover testing that have not be ID'd yet, so any info is good info as far as I'm concerned!
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,386
Location
The OP
The RRDB has entries defining some Interoperability Zone TGs as "V Tac 1, V Tac 2, ..." Are these "patched" to actual VHF Tac channels?
 

firephoto184

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
56
The RRDB has entries defining some Interoperability Zone TGs as "V Tac 1, V Tac 2, ..." Are these "patched" to actual VHF Tac channels?
I don't think that they have anything to do with VHF, I believe they are more command / county general talkgroups.
 

tvengr

Well Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
10,750
Location
Baltimore County, MD
Howard Co was previously a Motorola Type II system. They are presently in the process of migrating to a P25 Phase I system.
 
Last edited:

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,386
Location
The OP
Howard Co was previously a Motorola Type II system. They are presently in the process of migrating to a P25 Phase I system.
Technically it's a Phase 2 system operating in FDMA mode.
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,386
Location
The OP
I don't think that they have anything to do with VHF, I believe they are more command / county general talkgroups.
Any reason then to use the "V Tac" nomenclature? Could be a bit confusing if they are not actually crosslinked to VTAC channels.
 

n1nlr

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
19
I thought Howard Co was already Phase II. Am I mistaken or are they changing again?
Looking at your location are you thinking of the Howard county in Indiana?
We are talking about the Howard county in Maryland.
 

n1nlr

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
19
Any reason then to use the "V Tac" nomenclature? Could be a bit confusing if they are not actually crosslinked to VTAC channels.
Are they in zone V and someone didn't think about the confusion between the two?
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,386
Location
The OP
I've recorded over 7,000 hits on TG11041 thus pretty busy, and there has likely been many more hits than this. Unfortunately it's an encrypted TG - any ideas?
 

markgrutz

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
126
Location
Ellicott City, Maryland
TG 11041 was patched to old CROP (corrections operations). I don't yet know the specific name for the new TG, but I do know it is the Howard County Jail Operations. They used to have like 4 TGs, so it's safe to say that 11040, 11042 and maybe one north or south of that is also corrections operations.
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,386
Location
The OP
TG 11041 was patched to old CROP (corrections operations). I don't yet know the specific name for the new TG, but I do know it is the Howard County Jail Operations. They used to have like 4 TGs, so it's safe to say that 11040, 11042 and maybe one north or south of that is also corrections operations.
Thanks, that's good enoungh for now. I'm making notes in my UT2 database.

Does the county sheriff have TGs on this system?

I'm assuming that TG10930 and 10931 are Fire TGs Golf 2 and Golf 3 - any ideas of their usage?
 

markgrutz

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
126
Location
Ellicott City, Maryland
The sheriff had 6 on the old system. I can't speak to 10930 and 31 yet. I have been having a heck of a time getting my PSR-800 and TRX-1 tuned to this new system. I think I finally have the DSP dialed in. Those are not ones I have caught recordings of yet. I have a few connections I am working on and hopefully this week I might be able to extract a bunch of TGs.... we will see :)

Afterthought.... the sheriff TGs were all encrypted, so odds are they still are. I have about 21 that seem to be full time encrypted so far.
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,386
Location
The OP
The sheriff had 6 on the old system. I can't speak to 10930 and 31 yet. I have been having a heck of a time getting my PSR-800 and TRX-1 tuned to this new system. I think I finally have the DSP dialed in. Those are not ones I have caught recordings of yet. I have a few connections I am working on and hopefully this week I might be able to extract a bunch of TGs.... we will see :)

Afterthought.... the sheriff TGs were all encrypted, so odds are they still are. I have about 21 that seem to be full time encrypted so far.
I imagine you will have reception issues with GRE / Whistler radios on a P25 LSM simulcast system. Either you are in a sweet spot for reception, or you are not. You could try DSD+FL - a bit clunky but it works fine - just not very portable.
 

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
25,720
Location
Bowie, Md.
I noticed that the new system is flagged as being Phase 1 in the db. If it's going to go to Phase 2, a correction is needed, otherwise I can see folks buying Phase 1 capable scanners that can't handle Phase 2, like the 396XT, HP1 or any of the clones of the old PSR-500 and 600....Mike

 

n1nlr

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
19
I noticed that the new system is flagged as being Phase 1 in the db. If it's going to go to Phase 2, a correction is needed, otherwise I can see folks buying Phase 1 capable scanners that can't handle Phase 2, like the 396XT, HP1 or any of the clones of the old PSR-500 and 600....Mike

This is where we get into that weird it is, but it isn't issue. As of right now every talkgroup that we have seen on the new system is FDMA. My understanding is that to switch to TDMA and maintain the current coverage levels they would need to add more tower locations.

So right now you don't need a p2 scanner to listen to everything in HoCo.

But you are in Maryland, there are a number of p2 systems around and it will probably only increase. If you can swing it a p2 capable scanner would always be a better choice.

It would be nice if there was a way to mark a system as this advertises and could switch to using p2 talkpaths at anytime, but don't panic your p1 only devices will work for now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top