I've just started exploring the API the SDS200 exposes. I'm an old developer. It looks like the rtsp implementation is non-conforming to rfc2326 in at least one way. The OPTIONS request seems to set the state machine going, which from reading the spec should not be the case. The OPTIONS request should not alter the scanner's state, i.e. it should be idempotent. Attempting a second OPTIONS request gets no response and the scanner then becomes unresponsive for rtsp. So the impression I'm getting is clients must submit requests in the ideal order with no variation...e.g. OPTIONS, DESCRIBE, SETUP, and then PLAY as I've seen them do in WireShark. This is just one item I've found with the rtsp implementation, there may be others. Perhaps what's needed is the scanner supporting an out of sequence TEARDOWN request. Though maybe it does, I haven't tried it as yet.
In any case as the ProScan support account said...it's finicky.